Numerical Simulations to Predict the Seismic Performance of a 2-Story Steel Moment-Resisting Frame

Abstract

The seismic response of steel moment resisting frames (MRFs) is influenced by the behavior of joints. Within the ongoing research project “FUTURE”(Full-scale experimental validation of steel moment frame with EU qualified joints and energy efficient claddings under Near fault seismic scenarios), shake table tests will be carried out on a two-story one bay MRF equipped with different types of prequalified beam-to-column joints. In order to design the experimental campaign, preliminary numerical simulations have been carried out to predict the seismic performance of the experimental mock-up in terms of distribution of damage, transient and residual interstory drifts. In this paper the main modeling assumptions and the results of the seismic analyses are shown and discussed. In particular, the response of joints was systematically investigated by refined finite element (FE) simulations and their behavior was taken into account in the global structural performance by means of both concentrated plastic hinge and distributed plasticity models. Both static and dynamic non-linear analyses show in which terms the type of models for plastic hinges influences the results. The modeling approach plays a key role only at very high seismic intensity where large ductility demand is imposed. In addition, changing the type of joints has less influence on the overall response of the frame.

Behavior of Inno3d Joints Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading

“…A 3D model of the test specimens was developed based on the experimental set-up as shown in Figure 2. The model was developed by means of Abaqus software [28] and all the main modelling assumptions are in line with the models developed by Tartaglia et al [29][30][31][32][33][34]. Due to the large number of contacts, the bolts and the material nonlinearity, the full 3D model is difficult to construct and is computationally intensive.…”

Behaviour of T-Stub Under Mode 2 and 3 With Hv and Hr Bolts

“…The steel structures represent a viable solution in seismic areas providing a very good performance in terms of stiffness resistance and ductility [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Among then, in the recent years particular attention was given to the bolted connections that are widely used for steel structures due to both their lower constructional costs performance in terms of both resistance and ductility [8][9][10].…”

Influence of Beam-to-Column Connections in Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Steel Structures

“…Recent studies also focused on the evaluation of the seismic response of steel MRFs considering the influence of joint behavior by means of numerical analyses [4] and shake-table tests [5].…”