1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00945441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of a singular integral equation appearing in magnetohydrodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, BEM have been applied for solving MHD duct flow, however several problems have risen from the difficulties of solving huge systems and high computational costs due to the domain discretization. Papers at [13][14][15][16][17] are representative studies on the BEM solutions of MHD duct flow problems. All these BEM solutions have been obtained for small and moderate values of Hartmann number (M ≤ 50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, BEM have been applied for solving MHD duct flow, however several problems have risen from the difficulties of solving huge systems and high computational costs due to the domain discretization. Papers at [13][14][15][16][17] are representative studies on the BEM solutions of MHD duct flow problems. All these BEM solutions have been obtained for small and moderate values of Hartmann number (M ≤ 50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Helliwell [37] studied the Couette magnetohydrodynamic compressible flow with thermal radiation, between flat walls of arbitrary electrical conductivity, radiative emissivity and temperature, computing profiles of velocity, induced magnetic field, radiative flux and temperature. Singh and Agarwal [38] presented computational solutions for the velocity and induced magnetic field based on a singular integral equation describing MHD flow through a rectangular pipe with perfectly conducting electrodes. An increase in Hartmann number caused a flattening of the velocity profile and reduced flux through a section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, the use of (BEM) based methods has been favored as a way to deal with the difficulties of managing large system sizes due to the need to increase domain discretization accuracy. Examples for Hartmann numbers of 1 ( 10 ) O  are given by Singh and Agarwal (1984), Tezer-Sezgin (1994), Liu and Zhu (2002), Tezer-Sezgin and Aydin (2002), Carabineanu et al (1995), and Bozkaya and . Particularly, Liu and Zhu (2002), and Bozkaya and Tezer-Sezgin (2008), applied a (BEM) based methodology variant referred as dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM) for non-conducting walls, and also another one referred as time-domain (BEM) for arbitrary wall conductivity unsteady MHD duct flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%