1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0257(98)00067-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of fiber suspension flow through a complex channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the discretization of the advection equation is more complex. It can be carried out either integrating its Lagrangian description by means of the method of characteristics [5][6][7][8][9][10], or using the Eulerian discretization of its variational formulation: Streamline Upwind (SU) or Streamline Upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG) finite elements [11][12][13][14][15], discontinuous finite elements [16] or discontinuous finite volumes [15]. However, for the orientation equations as encountered in short fiber suspensions models, the interpolation of the orientation tensors (which is required if standard Eulerian discretization techniques are used) introduces non-physical orientation effects [17].…”
Section: Numerical Treatment Of Models Involving Advection Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the discretization of the advection equation is more complex. It can be carried out either integrating its Lagrangian description by means of the method of characteristics [5][6][7][8][9][10], or using the Eulerian discretization of its variational formulation: Streamline Upwind (SU) or Streamline Upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG) finite elements [11][12][13][14][15], discontinuous finite elements [16] or discontinuous finite volumes [15]. However, for the orientation equations as encountered in short fiber suspensions models, the interpolation of the orientation tensors (which is required if standard Eulerian discretization techniques are used) introduces non-physical orientation effects [17].…”
Section: Numerical Treatment Of Models Involving Advection Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of its low numerical diffusion and accuracy, this technique remains very time-consuming. Thus, in the original version of the method of characteristics, widely used in the context of non-Newtonian fluid flows simulation [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], for each point P where the solution is searched, we must reconstruct the upstream path until reaching the inflow boundary (where a boundary condition is imposed) at point Q, and from the solution known at point Q the equation can be integrated, using first or higher order finite differences, along the streamline until returning to the departure point P .…”
Section: Trðaþmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other possibility is the evaluation of the fiber orientation at the mesh nodes, using the same strategy, from which the orientation at the integration points can be interpolated [7,8,10,12]. A last possibility is based on the computation of the solution along a certain number of characteristics, from which the solution can be interpolated anywhere [11,13]. The strategy described in this paper can be applied to compute the solution of the orientation equation at the nodes, at the integration points or along certain characteristics, in general flows containing recirculating zones.…”
Section: Aðx; Y ¼ 8þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that, even at a low volume fraction in a Newtonian medium, a fiber suspension has non-Newtonian flow properties [1,2]. Lipscomb et al [1] found that the secondary vortex in a re-entrant corner at a contraction becomes larger for the flow of a dilute fiber suspension through an axisymmetric channel than that for a Newtonian fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%