2016
DOI: 10.1093/imamci/dnw002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of optimal control problem of the non-linear Volterra integral equations via generalized hat functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Tables 4–6, a comparison is proposed between the approximate values of x ( t ), u ( t ) and normalℑ achieved by rationalized Haar wavelet collocation method (RHW) (Maleknejad and Ebrahimzadeh (2015)), generalized hat functions method (GHF) (Mirzaee and Hadadiyan (2017)) and our method, respectively. These reported results demonstrated confirm the high accuracy of the proposed scheme.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Tables 4–6, a comparison is proposed between the approximate values of x ( t ), u ( t ) and normalℑ achieved by rationalized Haar wavelet collocation method (RHW) (Maleknejad and Ebrahimzadeh (2015)), generalized hat functions method (GHF) (Mirzaee and Hadadiyan (2017)) and our method, respectively. These reported results demonstrated confirm the high accuracy of the proposed scheme.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the following minimization of functional (Maleknejad and Ebrahimzadeh (2015))subject to the nonlinear Volterra integral equationThe analytical solution is given by x(t)=et2,u(t)=t, and =0. A comparison of the approximated values of normalℑ is made between the reported values obtained using Block-pulse series (BPS) (Shienyu (1990)), RHW (Maleknejad and Ebrahimzadeh (2015)), GHF (Mirzaee and Hadadiyan (2017)), and our method, in Table 7. Moreover, the absolute errors of state variable x ( t ) and control variable u ( t ) for k = 2, M = 7 are shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation