2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of the Fokker–Planck equation for fiber suspensions: Application to the Folgar–Tucker–Lipscomb model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the existing literature, the grid resolutions are 39×77 in Advani and Tucker (1990), 40×40 in Férec et al (2008), or were not mentioned in Lin et al (2010). So the calculation is carried on 36×72 grids and the results are listed and compared in Figure 5.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the existing literature, the grid resolutions are 39×77 in Advani and Tucker (1990), 40×40 in Férec et al (2008), or were not mentioned in Lin et al (2010). So the calculation is carried on 36×72 grids and the results are listed and compared in Figure 5.…”
Section: Comparison With Literature Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the finite difference scheme does not guarantee the local flux conservation (Férec et al, 2008;Bay and Tucker, 1992). A finite volume scheme was provided by Bay (1991), Férec et al (2008), Lin et al (2010), Bay and Tucker (1992), but the implementation of the boundary condition was not detailed. In practice, when 0   and 2    , the boundaries are joined together; thus, the spherical symmetrical boundary condition is written as:…”
Section: Boundary Condition Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations