1988
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(88)90330-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of the inverse problem in the analysis of neutron small angle scattering experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, knowledge on the particle size distribution and particle shape can result in a solution for the arrangement of the particles in space, as applied in structure resolving programs [187,147]. Lastly, by making a low-density packing assumption and given a known particle shape (from TEM), a unique particle size distribution remains [111,133,132,150,158].…”
Section: Scattering To Small Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, knowledge on the particle size distribution and particle shape can result in a solution for the arrangement of the particles in space, as applied in structure resolving programs [187,147]. Lastly, by making a low-density packing assumption and given a known particle shape (from TEM), a unique particle size distribution remains [111,133,132,150,158].…”
Section: Scattering To Small Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Svergun, Semenyuk & Feigin (1988) realized the approach described above in a program package GNOM which allows for automatic estimation and refinement of the a value. In principle, the package has features similar to those of other indirect methods (Glatter, 1977;Moore, 1980;Provencher, 1982;Mangani, Puliti & Stefanon, 1988). It allows reliable solutions to be obtained, being stable with respect to the experimental errors and termination effects.…”
Section: Kp=jmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[25][26][27][28][29] The use of contrast variation and the application of the same analysis to multiple datasets can go some way to overcoming these issues, by reducing the number of possible explanations for a given dataset. Additionally, other 'form-free' ways to analyse SANS data are available, for example the Indirect Fourier Transform (IFT) by Glatter 30 or the numerical methods suggested by Magnani et al 31 and recently Pauw et al 32 These yield probability distributions of the length-scales of the scattering objects and can be powerful, 'assumption-free' ways to determine information on particle shapes and sizes. For example, as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%