1990
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1650110403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of the steady incompressible Navier—Stokes equations for the flow past a sphere by a multigrid defect correction technique

Abstract: A nested non-linear multigrid algorithm is developed to solve the Navier-Stokes equations which describe the steady incompressible flow past a sphere. The vorticity-streamfunction formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations is chosen. The continuous operators are discretized by an upwind finite difference scheme. Several algorithms are tested as smoothing steps. The multigrid method itself provides only a first-order-accurate solution. To obtain at least second-order accuracy, a defect correction iteration is u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed flow field is in accordance with the assumption that the effect of magnetic field is the small perturbation of zero field potential flow. In the case of 0 M = , the drag coefficient values are in good agreement with the earlier work [Fornberg (1988), Juncu et al (1990)]. The comparison of the drag coefficient values for 0 M = is given in Table 5 and the graph of Reynolds number versus drag coefficient is presented in figure 29.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The observed flow field is in accordance with the assumption that the effect of magnetic field is the small perturbation of zero field potential flow. In the case of 0 M = , the drag coefficient values are in good agreement with the earlier work [Fornberg (1988), Juncu et al (1990)]. The comparison of the drag coefficient values for 0 M = is given in Table 5 and the graph of Reynolds number versus drag coefficient is presented in figure 29.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The comparison of the drag coefficient values for 0 M = is given in Table 5 and the graph of Reynolds number versus drag coefficient is presented in figure 29. Juncu et al(1990) 0.53 --- Figure 29. Reynolds number versus drag coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Approximating second order derivatives by central differences and convective terms by upwind scheme (UDS) prevents oscillations but reduces the order of accuracy to O(h). The results obtained by UDS can be extended to second order accuracy by applying defect correction technique (DC) [14]. In this study, the results are also simulated with UDS and DC techniques with a large domain of 120.023 times the radius of the cylinder and compared with HOCS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%