2012
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2012.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of unsteady boundary-layer separation in supersonic flow: upstream moving wall

Abstract: This paper is an extension of work on separation from a downstream moving wall by Ruban et al. (J. Fluid. Mech., vol. 678, 2011, pp. 124-155) and is in particular concerned with the boundary-layer separation in unsteady two-dimensional laminar supersonic flow. In a frame attached to the wall, the separation is assumed to be provoked by a shock wave impinging upon the boundary layer at a point that moves downstream with a non-dimensional speed which is assumed to be of order Re −1/8 where Re is the Reynolds nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the triple-deck theory (Ruban et al 2011) has partially solved the above limitation, all boundary-layer-singularity techniques are valid in the limit of infinite Reynolds number, as opposed to the finite-Reynolds-number flows arising in practice. Similar limitations apply to the Moore-Rott-Sears (MRS) criterion (Rott 1956;Sears 1956;Moore 1958), as shown in Williams (1977), van Dommelen & Shen (1982 and Yapalparvi & van Dommelen (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…While the triple-deck theory (Ruban et al 2011) has partially solved the above limitation, all boundary-layer-singularity techniques are valid in the limit of infinite Reynolds number, as opposed to the finite-Reynolds-number flows arising in practice. Similar limitations apply to the Moore-Rott-Sears (MRS) criterion (Rott 1956;Sears 1956;Moore 1958), as shown in Williams (1977), van Dommelen & Shen (1982 and Yapalparvi & van Dommelen (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In § 4 we presented the results of the numerical solution of the triple-deck equations for the boundary layer on an upstream moving wall. The case of an impinging shock, when the boundary layer is exposed to the adverse pressure gradient, was analysed earlier by Zhuk (1982) and Yapalparvi & van Dommelen (2012). Their calculations (and our theoretical arguments) suggest that the increasing wall speed suppresses the separation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhuk (1982) was the first to present a numerical solution of the triple-deck equations for the upstream moving wall. More recently the calculations were repeated by Yapalparvi & van Dommelen (2012). The results of these works suggest that increasing wall speed suppresses the separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the boundary layer separation has been extensively and deeply investigated in the past several decades, see Refs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. It is worth pointing out that the geometric theory of 2D incompressible flows has been established by Ma and Wang to study the structural stability and transition of 2D incompressible fluid flows in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%