2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solutions for tunnels excavated in strain-softening rock masses considering a combined support system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength parameters for a group of tunnel excavation cases are used to verify the proposed semi-analytical procedure (Table 9 ). The cases are from the References 2 , 3 , 6 . Figure 4 demonstrates the distribution of the normalised radial displacement predicted by the semi-analytical procedure and a self-similar method 2 for the SS rock masses with different dilatancy behaviours, which show good agreement with each other.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strength parameters for a group of tunnel excavation cases are used to verify the proposed semi-analytical procedure (Table 9 ). The cases are from the References 2 , 3 , 6 . Figure 4 demonstrates the distribution of the normalised radial displacement predicted by the semi-analytical procedure and a self-similar method 2 for the SS rock masses with different dilatancy behaviours, which show good agreement with each other.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tunnel closure should be predicted appropriately as it is utilised to determine the stability of the rock mass and has been adopted in the engineering practices to guide the preliminary support design. Many analytical and numerical methods were proposed to assess the ground reaction curve with different failure criteria, flow rules, and failure behaviours of the rock mass 1 6 . The solutions reveal the relationship between the tunnel strain and the support pressure, which are efficacious for determining the support type with a particular geological condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, using the CCM, an appropriate tunnel design can be achieved, taking into account the distance from the tunnel face where the support will be installed and the corresponding forces to which the support will be subjected until it reaches equilibrium with the ground (point E; Figure 2) (Song and Rodriguez-Dono, 2021). Main elements of the convergence-confinement method (CCM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical graphs obtained for the longitudinal deformation profile (LDP) -above-, and for the ground reaction curve (GRC) and the support characteristic curve (SCC) -below. Based on the work of Alejano et al (2009Alejano et al ( , 2010Alejano et al ( , 2012, Song et al (2020) and Song and Rodriguez-Dono (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the use of FDM can name the studies of Chakeri et al [9], Do et al [15], Jamshasb et al [26], Narayan et al [44], and Ziaei and Ahangari [91] as well. Some other researchers like [2][3][4]82], Zeng et al [92], Song et al [72][73][74] and Song and Rodriguez-Dono [75] presented specific numerical approaches such as the convergence-confinement method (CCM) for tunnels' excavation in rock masses. Although the simplicity of domain methods makes them favorable for seismic analysis of finite media, the models are intricate because of discretizing the whole body and closing the boundaries at a considerable distance from the desired zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%