2016
DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v29i6.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Solutions of 2-D Unsteady Incompressible Flow in a Driven Square Cavity Using Streamfunction-Vorticity Formulation

Abstract: In this paper, we have used a streamfunction-vorticity (ψ − ξ) formulation to investigate the problem of 2-D unsteady viscous incompressible flow in a driven square cavity with moving top and bottom walls. We used this formulation to solve the governing equations along with no-slip and slip wall boundary conditions. A general algorithm was used for this formulation in order to compute the numerical solutions for the flow variables: streamfunction ψ, vorticityfunction ξ for low Reynolds numbers Re ≤ 50. We have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hubert [17], explored the states of incompressible flow in a four-sided lid-driven square cavity by using the hyperbolic method. Ambethkara and Kumarb [18], used the flow-vortex (𝜓 − 𝜉) method to solve the problem of steady two-dimensional incompressible viscous flow in a driven square cavity with moving top and bottom walls. Gürbüz and Tezer [19], applied the Stokes approximation method to the Stokes equations for twodimensional magneto hydrodynamics to study the effect of the magnetic field on flow in a cap-driven cavity.Ali et al [20][21], the Forchheimer model's porous medium with changeable viscosity was used to theoretically examine the continuous dependency of double-diffusive convection .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hubert [17], explored the states of incompressible flow in a four-sided lid-driven square cavity by using the hyperbolic method. Ambethkara and Kumarb [18], used the flow-vortex (𝜓 − 𝜉) method to solve the problem of steady two-dimensional incompressible viscous flow in a driven square cavity with moving top and bottom walls. Gürbüz and Tezer [19], applied the Stokes approximation method to the Stokes equations for twodimensional magneto hydrodynamics to study the effect of the magnetic field on flow in a cap-driven cavity.Ali et al [20][21], the Forchheimer model's porous medium with changeable viscosity was used to theoretically examine the continuous dependency of double-diffusive convection .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this problem cannot be solved analytically due to the nonlinear terms that appear in equation (1). So that since the last decades, problem (1)-(2), with different initial-boundary conditions, has been solved numerically by some authors using several methods, such as the Petrov-Galerkin finite element method 10 , finite difference schemes, see for instance [11][12][13][14][15][16] , and the boundarydomain integral method 17 . Because of the poor stability properties of explicit finite difference methods, the implicit methods are more recommended to compute the numerical solutions of initial-boundary value problems in two or more dimensions-space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural convection in a rectangular enclosure by a discrete heat source was presented computationally by Qarnia et al [23]. Ambethkar and Manoj Kumar [24] have presented numerical solutions of a 2-D incompressible flow in a driven square cavity. Alleborn et al [25] have investigated a lid-driven cavity with heat and mass transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alleborn et al [25] have investigated a lid-driven cavity with heat and mass transport. Ambethkar et al [26] have investigated numerical solutions of a 2-D incompressible flow in a driven square cavity using streamfunction-vorticity formulation. Nithyadevi et al [27] have investigated the effect of a Prandtl number on natural convection in a rectangular enclosure with discrete heaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%