2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(02)00750-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solutions of stochastic differential delay equations under local Lipschitz condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistency analysis in [2] was performed for the Euler-Maruyama method. The latter has also been applied to SFDEs with variable delays and local Lipschitz conditions on the coefficient functions, using an interpolation at non-meshpoints by piecewise constants, in [15]. In [16] …”
Section: A Brief Review Of Methods and Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistency analysis in [2] was performed for the Euler-Maruyama method. The latter has also been applied to SFDEs with variable delays and local Lipschitz conditions on the coefficient functions, using an interpolation at non-meshpoints by piecewise constants, in [15]. In [16] …”
Section: A Brief Review Of Methods and Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…given θ . Markovian systems are more easily real-time implementable and the infinitesimal generator of a Markov process can directly be used to construct its probability distribution by solving the Chapman-Kolmogorov forward equation [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Time Delay Estimation In Lévy Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous examples in the literature where authors discretize SDDEs, typically with an Euler-type scheme (see e.g. [20][21][22]) so as to study their properties. Moreover, one can observe immediately that such an approach will allow the use of Monte Carlo simulations so as to compute the expected value of either a function of S(T ) or a functional of {S(t) : 0 ≤ t ≤ T }, and thus obtain the expected payoff of an option (see e.g.…”
Section: Euler-maruyama Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1) holds. More importantly, it enable us to define the EM approximate solution to the DGBM (2.3) following the author's earlier paper [21]. Let the time-step size ∆t ∈ (0, 1) be a fraction of τ , that is ∆t = τ /N for some sufficiently large integer N .…”
Section: Euler-maruyama Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation