2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1555833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical spurious solutions in the effective mass approximation

Abstract: We have characterized a class of spurious solutions that appears when using the finite difference method to solve the effective mass approximation equations. We find that the behavior of these solutions as predicted by our model shows excellent agreement with numerical results. Using this interpretation we find a set of analytical expressions for conditions that the Luttinger parameters must satisfy to avoid spurious solutions. Finally, we use these conditions to check commonly used sets of parameters for thei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, this avoids the case where the LH band would create an X valley in the gap region that might originate spurious superlattice bands. 26 A good procedure to avoid these complications would be to create a plot as in Fig. 2 for each of the constituent bulk materials, and to make sure that the LH-HH crossing does not take place.…”
Section: Bulk Band Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this avoids the case where the LH band would create an X valley in the gap region that might originate spurious superlattice bands. 26 A good procedure to avoid these complications would be to create a plot as in Fig. 2 for each of the constituent bulk materials, and to make sure that the LH-HH crossing does not take place.…”
Section: Bulk Band Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The g factors were determined by computing the Zeeman energy splittings in a uniform magnetic field, coupled to both the Bloch and envelope functions [23,24]. Spurious midgap states [25,26] were eliminated by including an optimized second-nearest-neighbor term [27]. The externally applied strain was included by introducing a fictitious stressor material at the bottom of the computational grid with a modified lattice constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the parameters used in this paper are listed in Table I. To avoid the spurious solutions arising from eight-band k · p method with finite difference method, 36 we use the parameters for electronic structures ͑spin-orbit coupling energies, optical matrix parameters, electron effective masses, and Luttinger parameters͒ reported by Lawaetz. 37…”
Section: Electronic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%