2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical stress intensity factor calculation in flawed round bars validated by crack propagation tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it might be negated by the plasticity and damage formation near the surface. For example, in an experimental study of steel circular bars subjected to bending and torsion, the experimental intersection angles were found to be very different from the theoretically predicted critical angles [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, it might be negated by the plasticity and damage formation near the surface. For example, in an experimental study of steel circular bars subjected to bending and torsion, the experimental intersection angles were found to be very different from the theoretically predicted critical angles [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Regarding the cruciform joint residual stress, it has different effects on the crack initiation and propagation. For the former, the crack initiation, the effect of residual stress is mostly noted in the stress concentration [ 39 ], While in the latter, the crack propagation, its effect is mostly found in the stress intensity factor [ 40 , 41 ]. The relationship between the various calculation steps is shown in Figure 1 , it can be seen that the calculation process consists of three parts.…”
Section: Framework and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) (b) The J-Integral leads to inaccurate results for contour integral evaluation on free surfaces (at the end of the crack front) due to the boundary layer effect [45,46]. This means that the 1/√r-singularity of the stress field on the surface domain is not fulfilled.…”
Section: Single Edge Notch Bending (Senb) Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the measured surface crack length, the SIF-range for the surface ΔKS and depth ΔKA is evaluated and used to generate ds/dN-ΔK diagrams for comparing the crack growth behavior of the different specimens. The J-Integral leads to inaccurate results for contour integral evaluation on free surfaces (at the end of the crack front) due to the boundary layer effect [45,46]. This means that the 1/ √ r-singularity of the stress field on the surface domain is not fulfilled.…”
Section: Single Edge Notch Bending (Senb) Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%