2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Studies of Dynamo Action in a Turbulent Shear Flow. I.

Abstract: We perform numerical experiments to study the shear dynamo problem where we look for the growth of large-scale magnetic field due to non-helical stirring at small scales in a background linear shear flow, in previously unexplored parameter regimes. We demonstrate the large-scale dynamo action in the limit when the fluid Reynolds number (Re) is below unity whereas the magnetic Reynolds number (Rm) is above unity; the exponential growth rate scales linearly with shear, which is consistent with earlier numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of mean-field responses (using the test-field method discussed in § 4.7.2) in several independent numerical simulations of non-rotating, sheared, non-helical turbulence with , now seem to have confirmed that the contribution of the shear-current effect to has the wrong sign for a large-scale dynamo, both in the FOSA regime of low (as it should be) and for moderate up to (Brandenburg et al. 2008 a ; Squire & Bhattacharjee 2015 c ; Singh & Jingade 2015).…”
Section: The Diverse Challenging Complexity Of Large-scale Dynamosmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measurements of mean-field responses (using the test-field method discussed in § 4.7.2) in several independent numerical simulations of non-rotating, sheared, non-helical turbulence with , now seem to have confirmed that the contribution of the shear-current effect to has the wrong sign for a large-scale dynamo, both in the FOSA regime of low (as it should be) and for moderate up to (Brandenburg et al. 2008 a ; Squire & Bhattacharjee 2015 c ; Singh & Jingade 2015).…”
Section: The Diverse Challenging Complexity Of Large-scale Dynamosmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…2008 b ; Brandenburg et al. 2008 a ; Käpylä, Korpi & Brandenburg 2008; Hughes & Proctor 2009; Singh & Jingade 2015). In the simplest possible Cartesian case, a shearing-box extension of the Meneguzzi et al.…”
Section: The Diverse Challenging Complexity Of Large-scale Dynamosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important difference in the present work is that the α fluctuations considered here are statistically stationary and homogeneous. The numerical simulations of Brandenburg et al (2008); Yousef et al (2008); Singh & Jingade (2015) demonstrated large-scale dynamo action in a shear flow with turbulence that is, on average, non-helical. This problem of the shear dynamo was taken up in a number of analytical works where the quantity α was assumed to be strictly zero, i.e., it vanishes point-wise both in space and time Sridhar & Subramanian 2009a,b;Sridhar & Singh 2010;Singh & Sridhar 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2008; Yousef et al. 2008 a , b ; Singh & Jingade 2015) where large-scale magnetic fields were generated due to non-helically forced turbulence in shear flows, and failure to understand these in terms of simple ideas involving a shear–current effect (Kleeorin & Rogachevskii 2008; Rogachevskii & Kleeorin 2008; Sridhar & Subramanian 2009 a , b ; Sridhar & Singh 2010; Singh & Sridhar 2011; Kolekar, Subramanian & Sridhar 2012), brought the focus to a stochastic which could potentially lead to the dynamo action generically in shearing systems (Heinemann, McWilliams & Schekochihin 2011; McWilliams 2012; Mitra & Brandenburg 2012; Proctor 2012; Richardson & Proctor 2012; Sridhar & Singh 2014). There is still a need to verify the model predictions for the growth of the first moment of the mean magnetic field in such systems by performing more simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%