2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical studies of finite element variational multiscale methods for turbulent flow simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mapping w h ∈ X h → z h ∈ X h admits a fixed point by Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem which is the solution of model (98). This follows from the stability estimates (that are stated here just for the solution of (98)):…”
Section: Application To the Simulation Of Turbulent Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mapping w h ∈ X h → z h ∈ X h admits a fixed point by Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem which is the solution of model (98). This follows from the stability estimates (that are stated here just for the solution of (98)):…”
Section: Application To the Simulation Of Turbulent Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several realizations of bubble VMS methods which differ in some details, e.g., see [62,68,69,98,112,113,31]. Here, exemplary the derivation of one of these realizations is presented.…”
Section: Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice this term is often omitted, and until recently it was not clear if it is needed for technical reasons of the analysis or played an important role in computations. The role of the grad-div stabilization was again emphasized in the recent studies of the (stabilized) finite element methods for incompressible flow problems, see [21,38,43,50], also in conjunction with the rotation form of nonlinearities in the Navier-Stokes equations [33,34,42] and variational multiscale turbulence modelling [27]. Its relation to the variational multiscale approach is revealed in [15,22,44].…”
Section: The Finite Element Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides a good compromise between accuracy and computational complexity, while keeping the numerical diffusion levels below the sub-grid terms (cf. [25]). Indeed, on the one side, it produces less numerical diffusion with respect to a simple semi-implicit Euler scheme, and thus it does not tend to artificially increment the turbulent diffusion.…”
Section: Turbulent Channel Flow (3d)mentioning
confidence: 99%