2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.55-57.892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study for Centrifugal Fan Based on Parametric Method

Abstract: This paper takes G4-73 centrifugal fan as the reference model. A practical parametric software platform was developed with VB Programming languages and Fluent software. Numerical simulation based on k-e turbulence model in the same flow rate was taken using the platform. The results show that the total pressure and efficiency of fans will be ideal when the blade angle take 45 degree, which is the design value. However, the best impeller width gotten from numerical simulation is smaller than the design value, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proven that using the numerical simulation method to study the internal flow field of a centrifugal fan is feasible, and the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations (URANS) are widely used by scholars studying the passage-to-passage flow fields of centrifugal fans. 1–3 Chen et al. 4 simulated the internal flow of a centrifugal fan under the same conditions as an experiment, and the results showed that the numerical results were consistent with the experiment results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It has been proven that using the numerical simulation method to study the internal flow field of a centrifugal fan is feasible, and the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations (URANS) are widely used by scholars studying the passage-to-passage flow fields of centrifugal fans. 1–3 Chen et al. 4 simulated the internal flow of a centrifugal fan under the same conditions as an experiment, and the results showed that the numerical results were consistent with the experiment results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%