2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of basal reinforced embankments supported on floating/end bearing piles considering pile–soil interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison, numerous studies (Liu et al 2007;Jenck et al 2009;Ariyarathne et al 2012;Zhang et al 2013;Bhasi and Rajagopal 2015) have modelled the construction and postconstruction GRCSE performance with DDCs as "wished into place" structural elements (either a plate element or linear-elastic material), with gross cross-sectional properties (i.e., uncracked material properties) and have numerically simulated embankment construction starting with the LTP construction. This approach ignores installation effects, equilibration, and the potential for columnar cracking, and as a result overestimates the lateral resistance provided by the installed columns.…”
Section: Implications On the Numerical Modelling Of Grcses Under Servmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparison, numerous studies (Liu et al 2007;Jenck et al 2009;Ariyarathne et al 2012;Zhang et al 2013;Bhasi and Rajagopal 2015) have modelled the construction and postconstruction GRCSE performance with DDCs as "wished into place" structural elements (either a plate element or linear-elastic material), with gross cross-sectional properties (i.e., uncracked material properties) and have numerically simulated embankment construction starting with the LTP construction. This approach ignores installation effects, equilibration, and the potential for columnar cracking, and as a result overestimates the lateral resistance provided by the installed columns.…”
Section: Implications On the Numerical Modelling Of Grcses Under Servmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of numerous studies that have investigated the globalscale behaviour of GRCSEs (Masse et al 2004;Liu et al 2007;Jenck et al 2009;Chatte and Lauzon 2011;Ariyarathne et al 2012;Zhang et al 2013;Bhasi and Rajagopal 2015) indicates that numerical analysis techniques are by far the preferred method of analysis for assessing serviceability behaviour. The study of global-scale GRCSE mechanisms through full-scale case studies as well as laboratory-scale physical modelling and centrifuge modelling is far less common.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the shear resistance in the embankment fill is significant in the soil arching effect, the grain size distribution should be well designed to prevent erosion caused by water flow (Premkumar et al, 2016). Some scholar (Bhasi and Rajagopal, 2015) have also considered the difference between the endbearing and floating columns and studied their influence on the soil arching effect. The endbearing columns may be of various types, such as concrete piles, semi-deep soil-mixing columns, stone columns, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers also showed that, pressure on foundation soil increased as fill height increased, which is contrarily behavior to British standard, BS8006. Due to this contradiction, researchers proposed a modification to British standard [5]. Lai et al demonstrated soil arching within geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced pile supported embankment by using discrete element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%