2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.97.125420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of cross-polarized plasmons in doped carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike ISBPs in quantum wells with oblique incident light excitation, ISBPs in 1D SWCNTs can be excited under normal incidence. Also, different from crosspolarized excitons, ISBPs are expected to be strong due to the concentrated joint density-of-states (see Figure 9(b)) as well as the suppression of the depolarization effect at high E F [85,86].…”
Section: Absorption Of Perpendicularly Polarized Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike ISBPs in quantum wells with oblique incident light excitation, ISBPs in 1D SWCNTs can be excited under normal incidence. Also, different from crosspolarized excitons, ISBPs are expected to be strong due to the concentrated joint density-of-states (see Figure 9(b)) as well as the suppression of the depolarization effect at high E F [85,86].…”
Section: Absorption Of Perpendicularly Polarized Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical point of view, if the spin degrees of freedom is replaced with pseudospin, such edge plasmon crystal without an external magnetic field is relevant to the plasmons observed in doped carbon nanotubes (albeit with a difference in spatial scales). [29][30][31][32] Though this appears to be an impossible geometry for EMPs, azimuthal plasmons in doped carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can be treated as a circular current in two dimensions, if the domain is regarded as the cross section of a CNT. This is an issue to which the results of this paper could be applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%