1983
DOI: 10.1080/01495728308963084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study of High Rayleigh Number Convection in a Vertical Porous Enclosure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Weber [2] and Shiralkar et al [8] were obtained using the pure Darcy model, while Tong and Subramanian [I71 performed a boundary-layer analysis using the Brinkman-extended Darcy model. Klarsfeld's results [I21 are actual experimental data.…”
Section: Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results of Weber [2] and Shiralkar et al [8] were obtained using the pure Darcy model, while Tong and Subramanian [I71 performed a boundary-layer analysis using the Brinkman-extended Darcy model. Klarsfeld's results [I21 are actual experimental data.…”
Section: Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Values of the Nusselt num ber obtained by other authors (Lauriat & Prasad 1987;Shiralkar et al 1983;Prasad & Kulacki 1984a, b) by full numerical simulations of the cavity flow a t various D arcy-R ayleigh num bers in the range 20 ^ 1000 and for an aspect ratio h = 5 are also shown in figure 5. These results agree well w ith present theory and even closer agreem ent m ight be expected for som ew hat larger values of h. The results confirm the existence of the universal N usselt-num ber curve Nu(l) predicted here and are also consistent w ith the prediction of the m inim um of the N usselt num ber a t l « 4.25.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This reduces the system to an infinite coupled set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations in the horizontal direction, a truncated form of which is then solved by a finite difference m ethod outlined in §4. The results are described in §5 and are compared with heat transfer predictions obtained from full numerical simulations of the eavity flow by Shiralkar et al (1983), Kulacki (1984a, b) andL auriat &Prasad (1987). The solution of the main core problem does not satisfy the full boundary conditions at the horizontal walls, and there is an adjustm ent within a two-tier boundary-layer structure near the top and bottom of the cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A representative Nusselt num ber for the overall cavity flow is defined by the heat transfer out of the cold wall rn N u = (7.1) Jo 0* This integral, taken down the entire cold wall, m ust be subdivided into three parts, corresponding to contributions arising from the core region and from the two end zones a t the top and bottom of the cavity. Thus where a 0 k, -0.012 and /?0 « 0.076, with formula (7.3) formally valid provided th a t A h. Practically speaking, the correction term in (7.3) is less th an the leading-order term provided A ^ 15 h,giving an indication of the actual range of v H eat transfer predictions obtained from full numerical simulations (Lauriat & Prasad 1987;Shiralkar et al 1983;Prasad & Kulacki 1984a, b) are shown in table 3 and are seen to be in excellent agreement with the formula (7.3) over the range A < 15 h.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1978), while numerical simulations have been carried out for tall cavities by Chan et at. (1970), Shiralkar et at. (1983), Prasad & Kulacki (1984a, b) and L auriat & Prasad (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%