2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1532-3641(2004)4:2(59)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study of the Bearing Behavior of Piled Rafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also significant that the predictions of E/E 0 at the soil-receiver pile interface match very well with those of Approach I, while Approach II produces lower E/E 0 values. It can also be seen that the soil modulus between piles in the direct analyses exceeds the far-field value; this can be attributed to the increased mean effective stress (p') between piles, similar to that documented by Reul (2004) for a free-standing pile group. As mentioned, however, it is the conditions at the pile interface that are of interest in this study.…”
Section: Influence Of Pile Cap Conditionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It is also significant that the predictions of E/E 0 at the soil-receiver pile interface match very well with those of Approach I, while Approach II produces lower E/E 0 values. It can also be seen that the soil modulus between piles in the direct analyses exceeds the far-field value; this can be attributed to the increased mean effective stress (p') between piles, similar to that documented by Reul (2004) for a free-standing pile group. As mentioned, however, it is the conditions at the pile interface that are of interest in this study.…”
Section: Influence Of Pile Cap Conditionssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In this interaction, shear modulus plays an important role rather than Young's modulus. Second, the pile-pile interaction is simply dependent on the pile spacing, number, and length [3] that may affect the efficiency of bearing capacity of piles. Third, the raft-soil interaction reveals the bearing capacity considering net contact between raft and soil that is usually satisfactory in safety.…”
Section: Soil-structure Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that load taken by the raft may reduce due to the presence of piles as ground stiffener. Reul [3] has conducted some numerical studies on un-piled raft (R), free-standing pile group (FPG), and piled raft (PR) foundations to see the phenomena of load sharing. In addition, free-standing pile group (FGP) is a type of foundations without considering any of bearing portion of raft (or cap).…”
Section: Bearing Resistantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations