Computational Methods in Multiphase Flow VII 2013
DOI: 10.2495/mpf130091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of the churn-slug transition dynamics in vertical upward air-water flows

Abstract: In gas-liquid two-phase flows through vertical ducts, the spatial distribution of phases may assume several configurations, known as flow patterns. Slug and churn patterns are characterized by an unsteady behaviour and their boundary is a subject of interest for many researchers. Different descriptions of mechanisms occurring at churn/slug transition may be found in the literature. One transition process is described by Taitel et al. (Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas-liquid flow in vert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For d/D equal to 0.32, the relation is directly proportional, however, for d/D equal to 0.45, the relation is inversely proportional, and for d/D equal to 0.55 and 0.64, nearly there is no variation in discharge coefficient by increasing Reynolds number with a value of discharge coefficient equal to 0.6 for d/D equal to 0.55 and discharge coefficient equal to 0.58 for d/D ratio equal to 0.64. Also, it can be shown from Fig 7 that the discharge coefficient for the circular orifice is in the range of 0.58 to 0.62, and these values are in agreement with ISO standard values (ISO, 2003) presented by Imada et al (2013). In general, the discharge coefficient for a square orifice is higher than that for circular and hexagonal, however, it has less C d values for triangular.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Parameters On Discharge Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For d/D equal to 0.32, the relation is directly proportional, however, for d/D equal to 0.45, the relation is inversely proportional, and for d/D equal to 0.55 and 0.64, nearly there is no variation in discharge coefficient by increasing Reynolds number with a value of discharge coefficient equal to 0.6 for d/D equal to 0.55 and discharge coefficient equal to 0.58 for d/D ratio equal to 0.64. Also, it can be shown from Fig 7 that the discharge coefficient for the circular orifice is in the range of 0.58 to 0.62, and these values are in agreement with ISO standard values (ISO, 2003) presented by Imada et al (2013). In general, the discharge coefficient for a square orifice is higher than that for circular and hexagonal, however, it has less C d values for triangular.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Parameters On Discharge Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The computational fluid dynamics technique is used to determine the calibration coefficient of an orifice meter numerically by Oliveira et al (2010). Furthermore, Imada et al (2013) compared the numerical simulation results with the ISO Standard, it achieved by applying the realizable k -ε and kω turbulence models. It was found that the predicted discharge coefficient values agree well with the ISO Standard, with a maximum error of 4.92%, the agreement is slightly higher for the k -ω model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it can be shown from Fig. (5) that the discharge coefficient for a circular orifice is in the range of 0.58 to 0.62, and these values are in good agreement with ISO standard values (ISO, 2003), Imada et al [11]. Fig.…”
Section: Discharge Coefficient In the Experimental Studysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Oliveira et al [10] compared numerical simulation results to experimental data using Fluent software, when compared to traditional experimental procedures, the numerical methodology used was able to estimate the discharge coefficients well. Furthermore, Imada et al [11] compared their numerical simulation results achieved by applying the realizable k -ε and kω turbulence models to the ISO Standard. It was found that the predicted discharge coefficient values agree well with the ISO Standard, with a maximum error of 4.92%, the agreement is slightly higher for the k -ω model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%