1994
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.63.1277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study of theS=1 Antiferromagnetic Spin Chain with Bond Alternation

Abstract: We study the S = 1 quantum spin chain with bond alternation H = i (1 − (−1) i δ)S i · S i+1 by the density matrix renormalization group method recently proposed by Steven R. White (Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1993) 3844). We find a massless point at δ c = 0.25 ± 0.01. We also find the edge states in the region δ < δ c under the open boundary condition, which disappear in the region δ > δ c . At the massless point, the spin wave velocity v s is 3.66 ± 0.10 and the central charge c is 1.0 ± 0.15.Our results indicate th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
96
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
13
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the number of gapless points is predicted to be the number of integers ≤ S + 1/2; in particular, the undimerized chain (with κ = 1) is a gapless point if S is a half-odd-integer. Numerical analysis shows this to be true for values of S up to 2 [8,9,10,11]; however, the numerically obtained values of κ at the gapless points do not agree well with the NLSM values. It therefore appears that there must be corrections to the NLSM analysis for small values of S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Further, the number of gapless points is predicted to be the number of integers ≤ S + 1/2; in particular, the undimerized chain (with κ = 1) is a gapless point if S is a half-odd-integer. Numerical analysis shows this to be true for values of S up to 2 [8,9,10,11]; however, the numerically obtained values of κ at the gapless points do not agree well with the NLSM values. It therefore appears that there must be corrections to the NLSM analysis for small values of S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Their argument was successfully confirmed by several theoretical methods [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. For the S = 1 system, the critical α separating the Haldane phase (α c < α < 1) and the singlet-dimer phase (0 < α < α c ) was estimated using a series expansion method [16], a density-matrix renormalizationgroup method [17], quantum Monte Carlo methods [18,19,23,24], the Binder parameter combined with finitesize scaling [20], and a level-crossing method [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…At α = 0.6, the system is in the vicinity of the gapless point [16,17,18,19,20,22,23,24]. The residues in 0 < q ≤ π decrease with increasing N , indicating that the lowest excited states in 0 ≤ q ≤ π form the lower edge of the excitation continuum.…”
Section: A Haldane Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation gives the single gapless point J 2 /J 1 = 1(l = 1) for s = 1/2 and J 2 /J 1 = 1/3(l = 1) for s = 1. Numerical calculations for s = 1 show that the gapless point is at J 2 /J 1 = 0.6 [9,10] and an experiment for [{Ni(333-tet)(µ-N 3 )} n ](ClO 4 ) n agrees with this value [11]. Hence the method of the NLSM does not always give quantitatively correct results.…”
Section: (Recieved)mentioning
confidence: 94%