39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of vehicle/pad configuration effects on launch ignition transients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main conclusions drawn by the authors is the importance of afterburning for determining the IOP amplitude. Three-dimensional simulations based on Euler's equations for a gas-phase reacting flow were performed by Pavish and Deese [13] on Delta II and III launchers on their pads to estimate unsteady loads and by Engblom et al [14] for a nonreacting flow. Majamaki and Lee [15] used the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, written for a nonreacting flow and closed by a k-ω turbulence model on two configurations of Delta IV vehicles, with an overall good agreement between flight data and numerical results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main conclusions drawn by the authors is the importance of afterburning for determining the IOP amplitude. Three-dimensional simulations based on Euler's equations for a gas-phase reacting flow were performed by Pavish and Deese [13] on Delta II and III launchers on their pads to estimate unsteady loads and by Engblom et al [14] for a nonreacting flow. Majamaki and Lee [15] used the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, written for a nonreacting flow and closed by a k-ω turbulence model on two configurations of Delta IV vehicles, with an overall good agreement between flight data and numerical results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%