1991
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1991)117:4(754)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Study on Crack Dilatancy Part 2: Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9, September, 1994. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9399/94/0009-1945 light on the interface slip has been shed by studies of slip at interfaces of other types, including relative slip of rough crack surfaces [e.g., BaZant and Gambarova (1980), Divakar et al (1987), and Feenstra et al (1991)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9, September, 1994. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9399/94/0009-1945 light on the interface slip has been shed by studies of slip at interfaces of other types, including relative slip of rough crack surfaces [e.g., BaZant and Gambarova (1980), Divakar et al (1987), and Feenstra et al (1991)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No separate stability study has been undertaken for the present model, in the sense of that undertaken by Feenstra et al [9,10], but as with any model that involves the simulation of softening behaviour, the tangent constitutive matrix of the present model can become non-positive definite. In such cases it can be advantageous, when the model is applied in a finite element code, to use an approximate tangent matrix, which maintains positive definiteness.…”
Section: Comments Thermodynamic Validity and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Plane stress elements were adopted with a multi-directional fixed crack model for concrete based on strain decomposition and combining plasticity for compression and smeared cracking for tension. The FE meshes used in this work were uniform and generally followed orthogonal directions with standard mesh densities of around 10 divisions for the depth of the beam, which is similar to models developed by others [42,43,44]. Full details of the meshes, boundary conditions, material models and numerical solvers used are given elsewhere [10,11,19].…”
Section: Non-linear Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%