2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-1033-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study using detailed chemistry combustion comparing effects of wall heat transfer models for compression ignition diesel engine

Abstract: The present work highlights the effect of wall heat transfer models on numerical predictions of combustion phenomenon in compression ignition diesel engine. A comparison of engine's performance is made using O'Rourke and Amsden, Han and Reitz and Angelberger heat transfer models. A detailed chemistry model employed comprises of 61 species and 235 reactions for n-heptane/diesel combustion. RANS RNG k-ε turbulence model (Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes: RANS; re-normalisation group: RNG; turbulent kinetic energy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows the methodology utilized in this work's logical order of activities. This equation uses the following constants: k is the molecular conductivity; κ is the von Karman constant (0.4187); B is the function defined by the value of u+ when y+ equals 1; Prm and Prt are the molecular and turbulent prandtl numbers; Tf and Tw are the fluid and wall temperatures; and uτ is the shear speed (derived from the wall's momentum law) [32]. (Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the methodology utilized in this work's logical order of activities. This equation uses the following constants: k is the molecular conductivity; κ is the von Karman constant (0.4187); B is the function defined by the value of u+ when y+ equals 1; Prm and Prt are the molecular and turbulent prandtl numbers; Tf and Tw are the fluid and wall temperatures; and uτ is the shear speed (derived from the wall's momentum law) [32]. (Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spray breakup utilizes the WAVE model, while collision employs the Naber Reitz oil droplet-wall collision model with a Wal1jet1 interaction type, C2=12, a critical Weber number of 50, and reflection angles less than 5°. Oil droplet evaporation relies on the Dukowicz model, ignition uses the Shell auto-ignition model, and combustion is modeled using the ECFM-3Z approach [21]. NO X emission is estimated using the Zeldovich model, and Soot emission is predicted using the Kennedy-Hiroyasu-Magnussen model [22].…”
Section: Computational Models and Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%