1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2760(19960620)12:3<154::aid-mop9>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical T-matrix solution for polarized scattering from a cluster of spatially oriented, nonspherical scatterers

Abstract: A small low-cost anechoic chamber has been described. It has proved useful for undergraduate teaching and research applications. The method of chamber construction lends itself to the demonstration of antenna performance and measurement techniques and facilitates relocation if required. The total cost of both the chamber and positioner was found to be less than f3,000 sterling.By combining the chamber and positioner with a network analyzer and personal computer, an automated antenna measurement system that all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural particulate matter has a tendency to aggregate and form single nonspherical particles. Scattering calculations for multiple nonspherical particles have been reported [56][57][58][59] based on the STMM. Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Discrete-dipole-approximation Method: Extremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural particulate matter has a tendency to aggregate and form single nonspherical particles. Scattering calculations for multiple nonspherical particles have been reported [56][57][58][59] based on the STMM. Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Discrete-dipole-approximation Method: Extremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This divergence would seem to provide another justification for the no-overlap condition, since two adjacent particles affect one another through their scattered field. Most derivations [4,27] and applications [28,29] of the STM method either explicitly start with the no-overlap assumption or abide by it implicitly by considering only sparse configurations [30,31]. While the assumption is irrelevant if all the constituent scatterers are spheres [11,32,33], it becomes increasingly more restrictive for highly anisotropic scatterers, effectively ruling out potential studies of densely packed aggregates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%