2022
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-xv98l
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NUPACK: Analysis and Design of Nucleic Acid Structures, Devices, and Systems

Abstract: NUPACK is a growing software suite for the analysis and design of nucleic acid structures, devices, and systems serving the needs of researchers in the fields of nucleic acid nanotechnology, molecular programming, synthetic biology, and across the life sciences. NUPACK algorithms are unique in treating complex and test tube ensembles containing arbitrary numbers of interacting strand species, providing crucial tools for capturing concentration effects essential to analyzing and designing the intermolecular int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our design process includes validation of our sequences by comparing the predicted secondary structures from Vienna RNA 46 and NUPACK 47,48 to our designs. This, coupled with the almost entirely base‐paired nature of our designs, means that prediction of the correct base pairing arrangement (i.e., secondary structure) should be trivial and the real challenge lies in correctly predicting the topological arrangement of helical elements and subtle deviations from ideal A‐form helices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our design process includes validation of our sequences by comparing the predicted secondary structures from Vienna RNA 46 and NUPACK 47,48 to our designs. This, coupled with the almost entirely base‐paired nature of our designs, means that prediction of the correct base pairing arrangement (i.e., secondary structure) should be trivial and the real challenge lies in correctly predicting the topological arrangement of helical elements and subtle deviations from ideal A‐form helices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the motifs that are incorporated from known structures and can be generated by comparative modeling (e.g., KLs and aptamers) are often different in the context of a larger RNA and in solution than they are in isolation in a crystal structure. 45 Our design process includes validation of our sequences by comparing the predicted secondary structures from Vienna RNA 46 and NUPACK 47,48 to our designs. This, coupled with the almost entirely base-paired nature of our designs, means that prediction of the correct base pairing arrangement (i.e., secondary structure) should be trivial and the real challenge lies in correctly predicting the topological arrangement of helical elements and subtle deviations from ideal A-form helices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SE duplex free energy relative to the single-stranded counterparts was calculated using NUPACK, assuming a temperature of 25 °C, 12.5 mM Mg 2+ , and 50 mM Na + ion concentrations. 59 For a convenient comparison between the experimental and theoretical results, we replot the theoretical morphology diagram of Figure 6 with ϵ b − ϵ a on the y-axis, as depicted in Figure 9b. Note that it is not possible to quantitatively compare the experiments to the theory since the models used are a simplified version of the experimental systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarize these findings in the morphology diagram in Figure a with dsDNA duplex free energies for the SE sequences. SE duplex free energy relative to the single-stranded counterparts was calculated using NUPACK, assuming a temperature of 25 °C, 12.5 mM Mg 2+ , and 50 mM Na + ion concentrations . For a convenient comparison between the experimental and theoretical results, we replot the theoretical morphology diagram of Figure with ϵ b – ϵ a on the y-axis, as depicted in Figure b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1. Sequences were generally designed to contain relatively isoenergetic binding sites and minimal self-structure of each slat as assessed using NUPACK. , For linear growth, growth-slat sequences for v6.1 from Minev et al were used, while for scission growth, growth-slat sequences were optimized as described below. Sequences in the region coupling nuc-x to nuc-y slats were designed to minimize the slat self-structure, have relative isoenergetic binding sites, and keep GC-content within 45–50% and avoid 6-nt repeats.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%