2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurse staffing levels and patient outcomes: A systematic review of longitudinal studies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
85
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The report recommended that future research focus on the relationship between patient outcomes, nurses, and their interactions 10 . Nursing outcomes research, including studies published both before and after the NQF report, conceptualized nursing care as a collective variable and a component within the Donabedian model of outcome measurement 2,4,6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The report recommended that future research focus on the relationship between patient outcomes, nurses, and their interactions 10 . Nursing outcomes research, including studies published both before and after the NQF report, conceptualized nursing care as a collective variable and a component within the Donabedian model of outcome measurement 2,4,6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Nursing outcomes research, including studies published both before and after the NQF report, conceptualized nursing care as a collective variable and a component within the Donabedian model of outcome measurement. 2,4,6 The Donabedian model asserts that high-quality clinical care is delivered when the appropriate personnel are given the appropriate resources. 11 Nurses, when considered within this framework, are collectively part of the process and structure that influences patient outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The association has been shown at hospital level in large cross-sectional studies and in a growing number of longitudinal studies examining the effect of variation in staffing experienced by individuals. [1][2][3] In the context of such an extensive body of evidence, one might ask what could possibly be left to discover?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%