Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of privacy protection behaviours and information provision

Kim, Kyung‐Hee; Han, Yong-Hee; Kim, Ji-su

doi:10.1177/0969733015622059

Cited by 39 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In some cases, we found that the four elements of psychosocial fundamental care were only a small component of the entire tool: this is the case, for example, with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, Hospital version (HCAHPS), in which we found, among 27 items, reference to fundamental care in only two items related to patients’ respect (Levin et al, 2017; Ng et al, 2009; Otani, Herrmann, & Kurz, 2011). For 10 other instruments, we found the same limitations (Spiritual Care Needs Inventory (SCNI‐21): Wu, Koo, Tseng, Liao, & Chen, 2015; questionnaire used by Kim, Han, & Kim, 2017; Person‐Centred Climate Questionnaire (PCQ‐P): Johnston, Gaffney, Pringle, & Buchanan, 2015; The intensive care unit psychosocial care scale (ICU‐PC Scale): Hariharan, Chivukula, & Rana, 2015; National Survey of English Inpatients: Hargreaves, Sizmur, & Viner, 2012; Chinese Comfort, Afford, Respect, and Expect scale (CARE‐C): Chung, Hsieh, Chen, Chang, & Hsu, 2018; questionnaire used by Chen & Raingruber, 2014; questionnaire used by Chaplin, Crawshaw, & Hood, 2015; Flemish Patient Survey (FPS): Bruyneel et al, 2017; Thai Nurses’ Caring Behavior Scale (TNCBS): Udomluck, Tonmukayakul, Tiansawad, & Srisuphan, 2010). Other studies, even though they did not specifically set out to investigate of the four elements of psychosocial fundamentals care, used instruments that could investigate all four elements.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 72%

“…Most of the studies involved patients only ( n = 36), hospitalised in different care units (e.g. cardiology n = 4; oncology and palliative care n = 11), although most studies occurred across various clinical specialities (Borhani et al, 2014; Bruyneel et al, 2017; Chaplin et al, 2015; Chochinov et al, 2016; Chung et al, 2018; Comiskey et al, 2014; Ehrlander et al, 2009; Ferri et al, 2015; Fröjd et al, 2011; Gattinger et al, 2013; Goh, Ang, Chan, He, & Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, 2015; Goh et al, 2016; Hall et al, 2013; Hargreaves et al, 2012; He et al, 2013; Kim et al, 2017; Ota et al, 2019; Otani et al, 2011; Papastavrou et al, 2012b; Periyakoil et al, 2009; Raee et al, 2017; Tauber‐Gilmore et al, 2018; Teunissen et al, 2016; Udomluck et al, 2010; Wu et al, 2015; Yousuf et al, 2009).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice

Bagnasco

Zanini

Dasso

et al. 2020

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and objectives:To synthesise and review literature related to instruments that measure psychosocial aspects of fundamental care in acute hospital care settings.Background: Psychosocial aspects of care often receive less priority in terms of care provision in acute care environments. At the same time, if these elements are overlooked, there may be consequences. Despite the availability of many instruments designed to measure specific aspects of care, these concepts are often not studied within the broader context of fundamentals of care, but rather coexist as isolated explorations of specific subelements. Design:A scoping review was conducted, based on Arksey & O'Malley's (2005) methodological framework and following the PRISMA checklist. Methods: Using the five recommended steps-identifying the research question; identifying relevant studies; study selection; charting the data; and summarising and reporting the results-three databases were searched: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE, in February 2019.Results: Following independent screening by two of the authors, 48 papers were included. From these 48 papers, 33 instruments were identified. Only five of these tools thoroughly assessed psychosocial aspects elements of care (dignity, respect, privacy and patients' choice) through dedicated items. Conclusions:This review provides nurses with a synthesis of 33 instruments that assess the psychosocial aspects of care. This provides an important resource to guide measurement of dignity, respect, privacy and patients' choice. The findings also provide guidance to future research in this field. | 1833 BAGNASCO et Al. S U PP O RTI N G I N FO R M ATI O N Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section. How to cite this article: Bagnasco A, Zanini M, Dasso N, et al. Dignity, privacy, respect and choice-A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 72%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice

Bagnasco

Zanini

Dasso

et al. 2020

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Literatürde yer alan birçok çalışmada, mahremiyet kavramının ve boyutlarının hasta ve hemşireler tarafından farklı algılandığı, mahremiyet ile ilgili tercih, düşünce ve beklentilerin değişkenlik gösterdiği görülmektedir. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Anthony ve Stablein, sağlık profesyonellerinin mahremiyeti; hasta bilgilerinin korunması, temel mesleki etiğin ve mesleki çalışmalarının bir parçası olarak algıladığını belirtmişlerdir. 21 Koivula-Tynnilä ve ark.…”

unclassified

“…ise iç hastalıkları ve cerrahi kliniklerinde çalışan hemşirelerin mahremiyeti korumayı önemsemelerine rağmen, mahremiyeti koruyucu davranışlarının daha az olduğunu saptamışlardır. 17 Literatürde, gelecekte hemşirelik mesleğinin birer üyesi olacak hemşirelik öğrencilerinin mah-Deniz ÖZTÜRK ve ark.…”

unclassified

The Privacy Consciousness Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study

Öztürk¹,

Eyüboğlu²,

Baykara³

2019

Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Bu nedenle hastaların mahremiyetlerini korumak için daha güçlü tedbirlere gereksinim duyulmaktadır. (14) Hemşirelerin hasta mahremiyeti algı ve yaklaşımları ile ilgili yapılan daha önceki çalışmalar, kadın doğum, acil servis ve yeni doğan ünitesi gibi özel alanlarda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu nedenle, genel birimlerde çalışan hemşirelerin mahremiyete yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesine de gereksinim duyulmaktadır.…”

unclassified

The Status of Protecting and Maintaining Patient Privacy of Nurses and Affecting Factors

Aktan¹,

Eşer²,

Kocaçal³

2019

HEAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To determine the status of nurses' protecting and maintaining patient privacy and the affecting factors. Methods: This descriptive study was carried out with 161 nurses working in a university hospital in İzmir between April and June 2017. The Individual Identification Form and the Patient Privacy Scale were both used in data collection. Results: It was found that 42.9% of the nurses read the privacy section of the patient rights regulation and all thought that privacy should be related to the patient's body. The importance given by the nurses to privacy was found to be high (4.47 ± 0.44). The mean body privacy score was the highest and the gender-specific privacy score was the lowest. There was a significant difference between the mean scores of the nurses in terms of education, participation in education about patient privacy, and the reading of the privacy section of the patient rights regulation. Conclusion: In this study, it was revealed that nurses gave importance to patient privacy. In order to increase the nurses' awareness of privacy, it is recommended that scientific activities be organized, especially inservice trainings on patient rights and privacy, and further research on this subject be conducted.

show abstract

Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of privacy protection behaviours and information provision

Abstract: These findings provide empirical data to create an ethical environment for the future, as considerable attention has been devoted to patients' rights and medical institutions' liability for providing explanations to patients.

Cited by 39 publications

References 22 publications

Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice

Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice

The Privacy Consciousness Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study

The Status of Protecting and Maintaining Patient Privacy of Nurses and Affecting Factors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About