2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurses’ Preferences for Bone Metastases Treatments in the United States

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate European physicians' treatment preferences for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. MethOds: Physicians completed an online discrete-choice experiment survey consisting of 10 choices between pairs of hypothetical medication profiles for a putative patient. Each profile included five attributes within a pre-defined range (based on prescribing information for the available bone-targeted agents [BTA]): months until first SRE (10, 18 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 In a study of physicians, patients, caregivers, and nurses in the USA, out-of-pocket cost to patients, time to first SRE, and risk of renal impairment were rated as the most important BTA attributes by each group. [30][31][32] These studies confirm that treatments that delay SREs and worsening of pain with a low risk of renal impairment are desirable in the opinions of both patients and physicians across Europe and the USA.…”
Section: International Journal Of Hematology and Oncologymentioning
confidence: 54%
“…14,15 In a study of physicians, patients, caregivers, and nurses in the USA, out-of-pocket cost to patients, time to first SRE, and risk of renal impairment were rated as the most important BTA attributes by each group. [30][31][32] These studies confirm that treatments that delay SREs and worsening of pain with a low risk of renal impairment are desirable in the opinions of both patients and physicians across Europe and the USA.…”
Section: International Journal Of Hematology and Oncologymentioning
confidence: 54%