2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-004-0162-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurses? reactions to alarms in a neonatal intensive care unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the number of nuisance alarm signals, care providers can experience a "cry wolf " effect, leading to desensitization and alarm system mistrust, so that real events are less likely to be acted on. [33][34][35] Eventually, this situation has led staff to begin to mistrust the alarm system so that real events are less likely to be acted on. [33][34][35][36] has termed this the "false-alarm effect" and has posited that the more sensitive a warning system is, the greater is the effect from repeated false alarms because weaker signals will be detected, thus creating more alarm signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the number of nuisance alarm signals, care providers can experience a "cry wolf " effect, leading to desensitization and alarm system mistrust, so that real events are less likely to be acted on. [33][34][35] Eventually, this situation has led staff to begin to mistrust the alarm system so that real events are less likely to be acted on. [33][34][35][36] has termed this the "false-alarm effect" and has posited that the more sensitive a warning system is, the greater is the effect from repeated false alarms because weaker signals will be detected, thus creating more alarm signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35] Eventually, this situation has led staff to begin to mistrust the alarm system so that real events are less likely to be acted on. [33][34][35][36] has termed this the "false-alarm effect" and has posited that the more sensitive a warning system is, the greater is the effect from repeated false alarms because weaker signals will be detected, thus creating more alarm signals. This issue of sensitivity may have been part of the reason for the results in a recently published study, 37 which demonstrated that, of 17 "crisis level" alarms that occurred, 16 were ventricular tachycardia alarms, 9 were for artifacts, and none of the alarm signals was for a true ventricular tachycardia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 In 2004, a study found that nurses did not seem to respond immediately on hearing the alarm, but they recorded the occurrence, assessed the urgency of the problem and eventually acted to remedy it during daily activities 18 . This sense can be justified because 10% of the professionals had no visible conduit to move to the box of the patient; they could indeed be observing and evaluating the patient if the alarm that sounded had represented the clinical condition of the same.…”
Section: Conduct Demanded By Alarmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent large controlled trials, the median SpO2 was often outside the intended target range [3,4,5,7]. Many studies have also documented serious problems with staff compliance with unit policy in SpO2 targeting [10,11,12,13]. While some have suggested benefits of not aggressively adjusting FiO2 [1,14,15] there is a paucity of literature describing or evaluating protocol driven FiO2-titration strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%