2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.joon.2006.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nursing assessment documentation and care of hip fracture patients’ skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower mean score for mobility could indicate a risk for PU. This result is in line with other studies of patients with hip fracture (Bååth et al, 2007;Gunningberg et al, 1999). By looking at every specific variable of the MNS, nursing staff have an indication of why a patient is at risk of PU and where resources should be targeted.…”
Section: Risk For Pusupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lower mean score for mobility could indicate a risk for PU. This result is in line with other studies of patients with hip fracture (Bååth et al, 2007;Gunningberg et al, 1999). By looking at every specific variable of the MNS, nursing staff have an indication of why a patient is at risk of PU and where resources should be targeted.…”
Section: Risk For Pusupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The MNS has previously been modified and used in Sweden (Bååth et al, 2008;Ek and Bjurulf, 1987;Gunningberg et al, 1999). The MNS has also previously been tested among nursing home patients regarding internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) and showed a result of 0.71 in a study by Berglund and Nordström (1995) and 0.59 in a study by Bååth et al (2007) for hip fracture patients.…”
Section: Modified Norton Scale (Mns)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1999). The MNS has previously been tested regarding internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient) and showed a result of α = 0·71 in a study by Berglund and Nordström (1995) and α = 0·59 in a study by Bååth et al. (2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, certain analyzable aspects of documentation like completeness, accuracy or legibility have been proposed since the emergence of EPRs [ 4 ]. Ignoring possible changes in documentation due to the introduction of an EPR seems doubtful, since inadequate documentation of clinically relevant aspects could result in patients not receiving the treatments they need [ 5 , 6 ]. This review follows the research question of which effect the introduction of the EPR has on the actual clinical documentation in hospitals and summarizes evidence from the comparison of paper-based and electronic patient records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%