Nursing history as philosophy—towards a critical history of nursing

Abstract

Mainstream nursing history often positions itself in opposition to philosophy and many nursing historians are reticent of theorizing. In the quest to illuminate the lives of nurses and women current historical approaches are driven by reformist aspirations but are based on the conception that nursing or caring is basically good and the timelessness of universal values. This has the effect of essentialising political categories of identity such as class, race and gender. This kind of history is about affirmation rather than friction and about the conservation of memory and musealization. In contrast, we will focus on how we imagine nursing history could be used as a philosophical, critical perspective to challenge the ongoing transformations of our societies. Existing reality must be confronted with strangeness and the historically different can assume the function of this counterpart, meaning present and past must continuously be set in relation to each other. Thus, critical history is always the history of the present but not merely the pre-history of the present - critique must rather present different realities and different certainties. In this paper, we use this approach to discuss the implementation of the nursing process (NP) in Germany. The nursing process appears to be a technology that helped to set up an infrastructure - or assemblage - to transform nursing interventions into a commodity exchangable between consumers and nurses in a free market. In our theoretical perspective, we argue that NP was a step in the realization of the German ordoliberal program, a specific variety of neoliberalism. In order to implement market-orientation in the healthcare system it was necessary to transform hospitals into calculable spaces and to make all performances in the hospital calculable. This radically transformed not just the systems, but the ways in which nurses and patients conveived of themselves.

Electronic health record as a panopticon: A disciplinary apparatus in nursing practice

“…Power is relational and requires engagement to induce actions while at the same time power structures the possible actions of the governed (Foucault, 1983b). Foth, Lange, and Smith () asserted that, as members of a profession and employees of healthcare institutions, nurses are socialized via governmentality to be well and easily managed through nursing licensure, professional regulation, market factors and neoliberal human resources. This is another example of Foucault's () technology of the self, where governmentality is manifest in the real world behaviours of individuals.…”

No more settler tears, no more humanitarian consternation: Recognizing our racist history and present NOW!

“…While we acknowledge efforts to raise awareness of these realities in nursing (e.g., Canadian Nurses Association, 2021), these efforts to date have been moral outrage at best and, in fact, highlight nursing's reticence to meaningfully engage with our past and present (Foth et al, 2018;Symenuk et al, 2020).…”

Governing through lifestyle—Lalonde and the biopolitical management of public health in Canada

“…Studies of governmentality try to diagnose specific formations of thinking, objectives, interventions and programmes as well as breakdowns and oppositions to these configurations (Dean, ). Thus, studies of governmentality are part of the “history of the present” (Foucault & Perrot, ), “meaning that a critical inquiry arising from a question posed in the present is traced back in history to determine how we arrived at where we are now” (Foth, Lange, & Smith, ) From this perspective, any analysis starts from moments in history when particular practices, situations or behaviours were problematized. These different forms of problematizations shaped people in such a way that they became manageable.…”