1993
DOI: 10.1177/105477389300200109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nursing Personnel's Perceptions of Physical Restraint Use in Long-Term Care

Abstract: The use of physical restraints as an accepted clinical intervention was dramatically changed by enactment of legislation in the United States. As a result, nursing personnel's notions of restraints as a therapeutic intervention were challenged. This study was initiated to obtain a better understanding of the underlying motivations for restraint use as a clinical intervention and to provide data helpful to nursing staff as they make the transition to restraint-free care. In the study, 124 long-term-care nursing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sampling procedures and study design were provided, with all 18 researchers' citing sampling method, strategy and analysis of the data. Varone et al ., 8 Schirm et al ., 25 Myers et al 3 . and Janelli et al ., 19 however, reported limited information about the methodology, strategy and design of the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sampling procedures and study design were provided, with all 18 researchers' citing sampling method, strategy and analysis of the data. Varone et al ., 8 Schirm et al ., 25 Myers et al 3 . and Janelli et al ., 19 however, reported limited information about the methodology, strategy and design of the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The larger the sample, the greater the probability of it representing the population 27 . Apart from three pilot studies, 3,10,25 power analysis (determining if sample size is sufficient) was absent from all quantitative studies, making it difficult to distinguish if an effect was there or not 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schirm et al 40 found that 40% of the nurses considered the use of physical restraints as a natural part of care and treatment responsibilities and that they were not aware of the negative aspects of the use of physical restraints. Thomas et al 41 found that nurses widely applied physical restraints for practical reasons, even though they were aware of alternative interventions and the adverse effects of physical restraint use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision making on the use or avoidance of restraints is complicated on the one hand by various external factors, such as institutional policy, legal and ethical issues, family and other societal pressures, and nurses’ professional values; and on the other hand by a number of internal factors, such as nurses’ personal values, attitudes and personal dilemmas (Kikuta, 1991; Morse & McHutchion, 1991; Scherer et al ., 1991; Werner et al ., 1994; Janelli et al ., 1995; Mahoney, 1995; Molassiotis & Newell, 1996; Sullivan‐Marx, 1996). It has been argued that the elimination of restraint use will require changes in nurses’ actions as well as in environmental conditions (Blakeslee et al ., 1991; Morse & McHutchion, 1991; Rader, 1991; Kayser‐Jones, 1992; Schirm et al ., 1993; Kolanowski et al ., 1994; Mahoney, 1995; Nelson, 1995; Phillips et al ., 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%