Nursing Research in Finland from 1958 to 1995

Leino‐Kilpi, Helena; Suominen, Tarja

doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01334.x

Cited by 11 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Endeavours to increase research awareness and to train students have been extensive. Similar research training schedules have been reported across Britain and elsewhere (Castles 1984, Ackerman 1997, Bakker & Finch 1998, Leino‐Kilpi & Suominen 1998), and are in line with efforts to help students increase their skills in evaluating, conducting, and writing‐up research (Fosbinder & Loveridge 1996, Bartholomew & Davies 1997, Clifford 1997, Fennessy 1997, Clarke‐Steffen & Stewart 1998). In addition, nursing journals have published self‐help articles on research methodology (Beck 1997, Cowman 1997).…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 69%

Nursing students’ perceptions of research: usefulness, implementation and training

Kincade

2001

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 69%

Nursing students’ perceptions of research: usefulness, implementation and training

Kincade

2001

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some studies have been bibliometric analyses involving quantification of information from electronic databases over a specified period e.g., Rafferty, Traynor, and Lewison (2000) and Traynor, Rafferty, and Lewison (2001) in the UK; Huang, Ho, and Chuang (2006) in Taiwan; and Pardo, Reolid, Delicado, Mallebrera, and Garcia‐Messeguer (2001) in Spain. A major alternative has involved analyses of information extracted from journal articles or abstracts e.g., Borbasi, Hawes, Wilkes, Stewart, and May (2002) in Australia; McCarthy, Hegarty, and O'Sullivan (2006) in Ireland; Bongiorno, Colleoni, and Casati (2005) in Italy; Leino‐Kilpi and Suominen (1998) in Finland; and Lin and Lu (2007) in Taiwan.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

International Differences in Nursing Research, 2005–2006

Polit

Beck

2009

J of Nursing Scholarship

114

126

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, in the analysis for trend, only quantitative data were considered, excluding the influences that may have been determined by the evolution of nursing education, research, and other factors as recommended by Leino-Kilpi and Suominen (1988). Future studies in this field should also analyze the social and historical influences and include the broader context to explain emerging trends.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neuroscience Nursing Research

Palese

Basone

Mestroni

2014

Journal of Neuroscience Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study extends an earlier investigation (DiIorio et al., 2004) regarding neuroscience studies published in four nursing journals over the period from 1989 to 2000. A literature review was conducted from 2001 to 2010 with the same search strategy performed by DiIorio from 1989 to 2000. A trend analysis comparing the articles published in the period of 2001-2008 with those published from 1993 to 2000 (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]) was performed. From 1989 to 2010, a total of 607 articles were published, 2.2 articles per month. A significantly increased number of publications on neuroscience nursing research have emerged comparing 2001-2008 versus 1993-2000 (OR = 2.1, 95% CI [1.22, 3.29]; p = .00). From 1989 to 2000, neurological problems were the predominant object of study (389 articles, 64.1%), followed by neurotrauma problems (156, 25.7%) and those neurosurgical problems (31, 5.1%). Moreover, a progressive reduction of studies focusing on neurological problems (OR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.26, 0.68]; p = .00) has emerged comparing 2001-2008 versus 1993-2000. The setting chosen for the study from 1989 to 2000 was mainly hospitals (211, 34.8%) followed by long-term care (125, 20.6%) and the home environment (77, 12.7%). Over the years (2001- 2008 vs. 1993-2000), studies performed at the home level were lower (OR = 0.27, 95% CI [0.15, 0.47]; p = .00), whereas those carried out at the hospital level and at the long-term care level have increased. Research in neuroscience nursing has continued to grow in the last decade, involving more patients who are mainly women. In the coming years, quasiexperimental, experimental, or complex intervention designs, involving the various care settings and along the trajectories of illnesses of patients who have an acute phase but especially in a long-term phase, are needed.

show abstract

Nursing Research in Finland from 1958 to 1995

Abstract: In the future, research is recommended in nursing care of children and adolescents as well as evaluative research.

Cited by 11 publications

References 9 publications

Nursing students’ perceptions of research: usefulness, implementation and training

Nursing students’ perceptions of research: usefulness, implementation and training

International Differences in Nursing Research, 2005–2006

Neuroscience Nursing Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About