Nursing Staff Requirements for Telemedicine in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Qavi, Tara; Corley, Lisa; Kay, Steve A.

doi:10.4018/9781930708426.ch004.ch000

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other benefits leading to a more systematic approach to disease management include contact with other clinicians regarding patient care (Qavi et al, 2001;Baldwin et al, 2002); elimination of redundancy in patient care (Pelletier-Fleury et al, 1999); enhancements to the effectiveness of the practice (Andersson et al, 2002) and improvement to laboratory information systems (Harrison & McDowell, 2008;Robinson et al, 2009).…”

Section: Drivers For Ict Adoptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…and duplication through better information storage and retrievalAgrawal et al (2007);Chon et al (2008);Gagnon et al (2009);Goldschmidt (2005);Papazafeiropoulou and Gandecha (2007);Riehle et al (2008);Stahl and Brooke (2008) Improved communication Improved communication to labs, radiology, etc. leading to improved disease management assistance in admissions, discharges and billing Cherry et al (2002); Christensen and Remler (2007); Gagnon et al (2009); Harrison and McDowell (2008); Husk and Waxman (2004); Robinson et al (2009) Reduction of business costs Reduction of administration costs Cho and Mathiassen (2007); Christensen and Remler (2007); Gagnon et al (2009); Goldschmidt (2005); Riehle et al (2008); Stahl and Brooke (2008) Improved business efficiency ICT improves both clinical and business practices Cho and Mathiassen (2007); Christensen and Remler (2007); Gagnon et al (2009); Goldschmidt (2005); Riehle et al (2008); Stahl and Brooke (2008) Improved patient care/contact Telemedicine, contact with other medical colleagues and treatment of chronic illnesses Anvari (2007); Christensen and Remler(2007);Martin et al (2009);Mohr (2008);Rahimi and Vimarland (2007);Wan et al (2007) Improved capacity to support systematic approaches to disease management Reduction of duplication and improvement of both clinical and business practices, leading to better disease managementAgrawal et al (2007);Andersson et al (2002);Baldwin et al (2002);Gagnon et al (2009);Harrison and McDowell (2008);Pelletier-Fleury et al (1999);Qavi et al (2001);Riehle et al (2008);Robinson et al (2009);Stahl and Brooke (2008with hospitals Harrison andMcDowell (2008);Husk and Waxman (2004);Robinson et al (2009) …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Do Organisational Characteristics Explain The Differences Between Drivers of ICT Adoption in Rural and Urban General Practices in Australia?

MacGregor

Hyland

Harvie

2009

AJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A number of studies have compared general medical practices in rural locations with those in urban locations. Some of these studies have concentrated on the reasons why a GP might choose to work in a rural or urban setting. Others have examined the type of work required to be undertaken by medical professionals. Increasing use of information and communications technology (ICT) in medical practices has led to some studies examining their use in rural as well as urban settings. However, little if any research has examined whether ICT adoption drivers differ between rural and urban GPs based on their organisational characteristics. This paper presents a study of 198 GPs (122 rural, 76 urban) in Australia. The results show that organisational characteristics are associated with the importance of the drivers for ICT adoption and that these characteristics differ between rural and urban GPs. These findings have important practical and theoretical contributions because it shows that ICT adoption decisions must be contextualised and that it is unlikely that universal adoption drivers will apply to all general practices.

show abstract

Section: Drivers For Ict Adoptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Organisational Characteristics Explain The Differences Between Drivers of ICT Adoption in Rural and Urban General Practices in Australia?

MacGregor

Hyland

Harvie

2009

AJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among these are not only issues about the nature of evaluation and evidence when technologies have not yet become stable [134], but also about changes health care delivery is undergoing. As with previous medical technologies and information systems, as well as newer consumer informatics applications and health management uses, telehealth technologies may be used in ways that re-define how health care is practiced and delivered [52,142,184,[206][207][208][209].Telehealth, too, makes more evident concerns over what "information" consists of in health care [52,60,207,210], and highlights how computer-mediated clinical encounters differ from face-to-face ones [210][211][212][213][214].…”

Section: New Challenges Changes In Technologies and In Health Care Dementioning

confidence: 99%

Future Directions in Evaluation Research: People, Organizational, and Social Issues

Kaplan

Shaw

2004

Methods Inf Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation research is key in identifying how people, organizational, and social issues - all crucial to system design, development, implementation, and use - interplay with informatics projects. Building on a long history of contributions and using a variety of methods, researchers continue developing evaluation theories and methods while producing significant interesting studies. We recommend that future research: 1) Address concerns of the many individuals involved in or affected by informatics applications. 2) Conduct studies in different type and size sites, and with different scopes of systems and different groups of users. Do multi-site or multi-system comparative studies. 3) Incorporate evaluation into all phases of a project. 4) Study failures, partial successes, and changes in project definition or outcome. 5) Employ evaluation approaches that take account of the shifting nature of health care and project environments, and do formative evaluations. 6) Incorporate people, social, organizational, cultural, and concomitant ethical issues into the mainstream of medical informatics. 7) Diversify research approaches and continue to develop new approaches. 8) Conduct investigations at different levels of analysis. 9) Integrate findings from different applications and contextual settings, different areas of health care, studies in other disciplines, and also work that is not published in traditional research outlets. 10) Develop and test theory to inform both further evaluation research and informatics practice.

show abstract

“…Among these issues are how technology incorporates new rules and resources that embody new structures for health care [105]. As with previous medical technologies and information systems, as well as newer consumer informatics applications, telehealth technologies may be used in ways that redefine how health care is delivered, or change the relationship and personal distance between practitioner and patient [68,106,107,108,109]. Imaging technologies, among others, have provoked discussion of how the meaning of clinical findings is negotiated among clinicians, and of the effects of making visible clinical work and procedures that previously had been seen only by those involved [109,110,111].…”

Section: Current Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As with previous medical technologies and information systems, as well as newer consumer informatics applications, telehealth technologies may be used in ways that redefine how health care is delivered, or change the relationship and personal distance between practitioner and patient [68,106,107,108,109]. Imaging technologies, among others, have provoked discussion of how the meaning of clinical findings is negotiated among clinicians, and of the effects of making visible clinical work and procedures that previously had been seen only by those involved [109,110,111]. Another new use of technology, telephone keypads which patients/consumers use for input into a voice-response intelligent consultation system [112], like some older applications [29,61,70,113,114], raises issues of the different meanings information and communication technologies have for different users, even among those who appear to be of the same group.…”

Section: Current Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%