1996
DOI: 10.1080/00103629609369747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient accumulation and nitrate leaching under broiler litter amended corn fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Solution NO 3 results in 1999 were comparable to the findings of Wood et al (1996) on a silty clay soil in Alabama, where NO 3 -N concentrations in soil percolate 1 m below corn cover-cropped with cereal rye were greater under fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) than under manure (preplant broadcast incorporated). Both the fertilized and the high (18 Mg ha -1 ) poultry litter rate treatments resulted in some NO 3 -N concentrations above the drinking water standard, but overall concentrations averaged 8.3 and 4.8 mg L -1 respectively.…”
Section: Soil Water Content and No 3 Leachingsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solution NO 3 results in 1999 were comparable to the findings of Wood et al (1996) on a silty clay soil in Alabama, where NO 3 -N concentrations in soil percolate 1 m below corn cover-cropped with cereal rye were greater under fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) than under manure (preplant broadcast incorporated). Both the fertilized and the high (18 Mg ha -1 ) poultry litter rate treatments resulted in some NO 3 -N concentrations above the drinking water standard, but overall concentrations averaged 8.3 and 4.8 mg L -1 respectively.…”
Section: Soil Water Content and No 3 Leachingsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…between plots fertilized with either ammonium nitrate or liquid dairy manure (pre-plant broadcast) in a study by Jemison and Fox (1994), while Wood et al (1996) found that fertilizer-amended soil posed a greater risk for groundwater NO 3 contamination than soils amended with broiler litter. These findings are highly contradictory and suggest that further research in this area is needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PL did not change soil Fe concentrations (P = 0.5871) when PL and IF application rates were based on the same N rate. Land application of PL can alter the elemental concentration in soils since the litter contains N, P, K, Ca, Mg, sulphur (S), and trace elements (Bolan et al, 2010;Wood et al, 1996). Higher soil C concentrations in PL treatments could be due to direct C input by the litter itself and indirect C input through increased net primary production, for example, roots and plant residues (Aoyama et al, 1999;Bhattacharyya et al, 2010;Maillard and Angers, 2014;Whalen and Chang, 2002).…”
Section: Soil Residue Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of PL to cropland can also increase soil organic matter (Watts et al, 2010); thereby improving soil quality and productivity (Kingery et al, 1994). Continuous application of litter or manure can increase the levels of C, N, P, K, Ca and Mg in the soil (Ginting et al, 2003;Mugwira, 1979;Wallingford et al, 1975;Watts et al, 2010;Wood et al, 1996), thus creating a reservoir of soil nutrients for several years after application. Agbede and Ojeniyi (2009) found similar results with sorghum production in southwestern Nigeria; no-till with or without mulch in combination with 7.5 Mg ha -1 of PL improved soil organic C, total N, available P, exchangeable K, Ca and Mg concentration and grain yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a substantial number of studies have been conducted to determine Pl effects on agriculture and environment. some of these studies show advantages such as: high nutrient concentration (Zhang et al, 2002), increase in total soil carbon and organic matter content (adeli et al, 2008; singh et al, 2009), increased soil water retention and infiltration (Kingery et al, 1994), increased soil pH (Zhang, 1998), improved soil physical, chemical andbiological properties (nyakatawa et al, 2001;Friend et al, 2006;mcGrath et al, 2009), and improved crop yields of, e.g., corn, soybean, cotton, and pastures (Wood et al, 1996;sistani et al, 2004;adeli et al, 2005;mitchell & tu, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%