2015
DOI: 10.5194/bg-12-3665-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient and mercury deposition and storage in an alpine snowpack of the Sierra Nevada, USA

Abstract: Abstract. Biweekly snowpack core samples were collected at seven sites along two elevation gradients in the Tahoe Basin during two consecutive snow years to evaluate total wintertime snowpack accumulation of nutrients and pollutants in a high-elevation watershed of the Sierra Nevada. Additional sampling of wet deposition and detailed snow pit profiles were conducted the following year to compare wet deposition to snowpack storage and assess the vertical dynamics of snowpack nitrogen, phosphorus, and mercury. R… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Louis et al, 2005;Steffen et al, 2002). The low concentrations we measured result in very small pool sizes of Hg diss stored in the snowpack during wintertime compared to temperate studies (Pearson et al, 2015). At Toolik, snowpack pool sizes amounted to 26.9 and (Figure 7).…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Patterns Of Snowbound Mercury In The Inmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Louis et al, 2005;Steffen et al, 2002). The low concentrations we measured result in very small pool sizes of Hg diss stored in the snowpack during wintertime compared to temperate studies (Pearson et al, 2015). At Toolik, snowpack pool sizes amounted to 26.9 and (Figure 7).…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Patterns Of Snowbound Mercury In The Inmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We also suggest largely an absence of re-emission losses or elution losses from snow melt as occurs in temperate snowpacks (discussed in Faïn et al (2013) and Pearson et al (2015)). Elution losses are unlikely given that no temperatures above freezing were present in the Arctic until May, and atmospheric re-emissions losses of volatile Hg 0 gas were not important in this arctic snowpack for most of the season as discussed above.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Patterns Of Snowbound Mercury In The Inmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Louis et al, 2005;Steffen et al, 2002). The low concentrations we measured result in very small pool sizes of Hg diss stored in the snowpack during wintertime compared to temperate studies (Pearson et al, 2015). At Toolik, snowpack pool sizes amounted to 26.9 and 19.7 ng m −2 during peak snowpack and prior to the onset of snowmelt in 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, respectively.…”
Section: Snowbound Mercury In the Interior Arctic Snowpack 331 Spatmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Hence, we suggest no significant additional deposition of Hg (e.g., by dry deposition of gaseous or particulate Hg) to exposed older snow consistent with the lack of correlation to pollution tracers and NO − 3 ). We also suggest an absence or minor importance of re-emission losses or elution losses from snowmelt as occurs in temperate snowpacks (discussed in Faïn et al, 2013, andPearson et al, 2015). Elution losses are unlikely, given that no temperatures above freezing were present in the Arctic until May, and atmospheric re-emissions losses of volatile Hg 0 gas were not important in this Arctic snowpack for most of the season as discussed above.…”
Section: Cation and Anion Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It also takes an intermediate position relative to the Alps: lower than in Tyrolean Alps (308 µg NO3- Felip et al 1995) but higher than most sampling points in the French Alps (Dambrine et al, 2018). Finally, nitrate concentration in Ergaki snow was in between that of the Bothnian Bay of the Baltic sea (480 ±130 µg NO3-N•l -1 , Rahm et al 1995) and the lake Tahoe basin in Sierra Nevada (14-138 µg NO3-N•l -1 , Pearson et al 2015). Note that, paradoxically, the former is considered a low atmospheric nitrogen deposition region (Bergström and Jansson, 2006) whereas the latter has been reckoned as an airborne nutrient enriched area (Sickman et al, 2003) where atmospheric nitrogen deposition has shifted phytoplankton limitation from N and P colimitation to persistent P limitation (Jassby et al, 1994).…”
Section: Air Mass Retrotrajectory Analysis and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 92%