1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02849377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient concentration relationships between the fourth petiole and upper-stem of potato plants

Abstract: Successfully evaluating the nutritional status of a crop during growth and development is dependent upon sampling an identifiable plant part.Consistently sampling a petiole of the same maturity in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) is difficult. We evaluated the nutrient relationships between the upper-stem and the fourth petiole from Russet Burbank plants in field studies having N, P, K, Zn or Mn variables. The upper-stem was obtained by excising the stem below the sixth leaf and removing all leaves and the term… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 20 DAE, critical P concentrations were higher in the petiole and leaflets than in the leaves, stems, and tubers. Being a slightly mobile element, P is translocated to the growing meristem and will tend to accumulate in the youngest plant parts (Westerman et al, 1994). Considering that almost every portion of the potato plant has been used to determine its nutritional status (Gupta and Saxena, 1976), P translocation should be taken into account when selecting the time and plant part used for assessing the P status of the plant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 20 DAE, critical P concentrations were higher in the petiole and leaflets than in the leaves, stems, and tubers. Being a slightly mobile element, P is translocated to the growing meristem and will tend to accumulate in the youngest plant parts (Westerman et al, 1994). Considering that almost every portion of the potato plant has been used to determine its nutritional status (Gupta and Saxena, 1976), P translocation should be taken into account when selecting the time and plant part used for assessing the P status of the plant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a specific potato plant part must be taken if the P concentration is to reflect P availability as well as being correlated to yield. The relationship that exists between nutrient element concentration in various potato plant parts and crop yield is already known (Jones et al, 1991;Lorenz, 1944;Reuter and Robinson, 1986;Walworthand Muniz, 1993;Westerman et al, 1994), but norms must be used which take into account the plant part sampled, growth stage, field variation, and variety (Ortiz et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The plant part chosen should be sensitive to nutrient supply, easily identifiable, be related to growth or yield response, have a wide range between deficiency and adequate concentrations, and have a CNC (Ulrich, 1948;Westermann et al, 1994). Examples of using different plant parts are described by Elliott et al (1997c), Hoppo et al (1999), and Knowles et al (1990).…”
Section: Sampling Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is often difficult to define and select specific index tissues such as leaves, the use of upper stem tissue has also been investigated for other crops. For example, Westermann and Bosma [4] working with potatoes in the United States, concluded that sampling variability was significantly less with the upper stem tissue compared with the fourth petiole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%