1997
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient Cycling and Nutrient Use Efficiency in Short Rotation, High Density Central Himalayan Tarai Poplar Plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
9
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some other studies demonstrated that both natural forests and mixed species stands could show better hydrological function than the single-species plantation and that this single-species plantation had a limited role in soil protection (Calder et al 1993;Wang et al 2006). The single-species plantations could concentrate the amount of nutrient in the biomass and had greater nutrient uptake by the plant, resulting in depletion of nutrient resources in the soil of the subtropical central Himalayas (Lodhiyal and Lodhiyal 1997). The poor nutrient availability of the soil in the single-species plantations has a negative effect on plant species distribution and prevented understory growth, leading to a decrease in biodiversity and further soil erosion (Tang et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, some other studies demonstrated that both natural forests and mixed species stands could show better hydrological function than the single-species plantation and that this single-species plantation had a limited role in soil protection (Calder et al 1993;Wang et al 2006). The single-species plantations could concentrate the amount of nutrient in the biomass and had greater nutrient uptake by the plant, resulting in depletion of nutrient resources in the soil of the subtropical central Himalayas (Lodhiyal and Lodhiyal 1997). The poor nutrient availability of the soil in the single-species plantations has a negative effect on plant species distribution and prevented understory growth, leading to a decrease in biodiversity and further soil erosion (Tang et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a consequence, and because the relative amount of bark increases with decreasing shoot diameter, the proportion of bark to wood is much higher in SRC than in traditional forestry [11]. As bark contains much higher nutrient concentrations than bole wood [4,12,13], this leads to a relatively larger nutrient removal and, consequently, to a higher nutrient requirement for trees grown as SRC [4,7,14]. In traditional forestry, managers strive to achieve the lowest amount of bark in the harvested wood, because bark also reduces the combustion quality of the fuel wood [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We focused on the proleptic branches to assess the average nutrient concentrations in the crown part. The quantification of nutrient fluxes in a managed ecosystem is very important for assessing the fertilisation requirements [4,14,18], because fertilisation is the most energy-consuming process in the life cycle of an SRC culture [9,19]. Reliable data on stand and nutrient dynamics are scarce [5,20] and they rarely take genotypic differences into account [21], although these differences are essential for making correct decisions about fertiliser application [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilization, circulation, and fluxion of nutrients connect organic matter and soil system (Lodhiyal and Neelu, 1997). During the 1950s and 1960s, scientists had systemically researched the role and cycling process of nutrients in forest ecosystems, especially after putting IBP and MAB into practice (Jordan, 1985;Hüttl and Schaaf, 1995;Lodhiyal and Neelu, 1997;Treseder and Vitousek, 2001;Joanna et al, 2002;Neelu and Lodhiyal, 2003). Plenty of home fruits have been produced by cycling forest ecosystem nutrients in China since the 1980s (Chen et al, 1997;Xiang and Tian, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%