2001
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/74.1.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient cycling in a natural beech forest and adjacent planted pine in northern Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Algunas excepciones son la relación utilizada por Ortiz (16) para bosques secundarios de Costa Rica, quien lo fija en 45%, monto que se acerca a los valores determinados en este estudio; también Segura (6) con 45% para madera de Quercus sp., y Santa Regina y Tarazona (17), quienes determinan en 45,7±1,1% el contenido de carbono en hojas de la especie Fagus sylvatica.…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusionunclassified
“…Algunas excepciones son la relación utilizada por Ortiz (16) para bosques secundarios de Costa Rica, quien lo fija en 45%, monto que se acerca a los valores determinados en este estudio; también Segura (6) con 45% para madera de Quercus sp., y Santa Regina y Tarazona (17), quienes determinan en 45,7±1,1% el contenido de carbono en hojas de la especie Fagus sylvatica.…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusionunclassified
“…3-A1 and 2-A1; see also Bauer et al, 1997;Millard and Grelet, 2010). The intensive N re-translocation is necessary to conserve N for leaf establishment in spring independently of soil N availability (Santa-Regina and Tarazona, 2001). The N re-translocation efficiency was about 55 % and 76 % for leaves at the canopy base and top of the beech trees, respectively.…”
Section: Differences In Seasonal and Spatial Variation Of Foliar N Comentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The retranslocation of N in Scots pine needles in Finland has been estimated to be around 73 % (Helmisaari, 1992). Across a number of evergreen shrubs and trees, the N re-translocation efficiency was on average reported to be 50 % (Aerts, 1996;Santa-Regina and Tarazona, 2001;see Fig. 5).…”
Section: Differences In Seasonal and Spatial Variation Of Foliar N Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical and chemical properties of litterfall infl uence myriad habitat processes that affect phenotypic plasticity of plant biochemistry (e.g., Loranger et al, 2002;Madritch and Hunter, 2002;Santa Regina and Tarazona, 2001). For example, Allison and Vitousek (2004) report a 50-fold variation in leaf litter decay rates among 11 species, with native species exhibiting much slower decay rates than alien invader species.…”
Section: Cover Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%