Nutrient Digestibility and Plane of Nutrition of Different Varieties of Normal and High Quality Protein Maize (HQPM) Fodder at Pre-cob and Post-cob Stage in Lactating Sahiwal Cows

Vaswani, Shalini; Kumar, Ravindra; Kumar, Vinod; Roy, Debashis; Kumar, Muneendra

doi:10.5958/2277-940x.2017.00078.x

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The average CP content (7.49%) obtained in the current study was in line with that observed (7.31%) by Lee et al (2014). However, it was lower than the observations (10.67 -11.27%, 9.80%, and 8.82%) of Ijabadeniyi and Adebolu (2005), Sumbo and Victor (2014), and Kılınç et al (2018), and greater than the ratio (7.10%) that was reported by Vaswani et al, (2016). These discrepancies might be due to differences in variety, genotype, ecological conditions of the place where the study was carried out, and the total precipitation and temperature during the harvest time and vegetation.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

Nutrient contents and in vitro digestibility of different parts of corn plant

Ayaşan

Çetinkaya

Aykanat³

et al. 2020

SA J. An. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstractThe objective of this study was to assess the nutrient contents and in vitro true digestibility (IVTD) of parts of the corn plant. The corn used in the study was P2088, a variety that is grown widely in Turkey. It had matured and was harvested 140 days after planting. Four replicate plants were separated into nine parts, namely lower stalk, central stalk, upper stalk, corn ear stalk, corn ear shuck, kernels, corn cob, leaf, tassel, plus the entire plant. The samples were dried and ground for analysis. Nutritional values were determined in the laboratory and in vitro digestibility was assessed. Significant differences in nutrient content were observed among parts of the corn plant. The highest crude protein (CP) content was found in the leaf (12.41%), followed by the grain (12.37%). Dry matter (DM) varied from 91.25% to 96.07%. The highest ether extract (EE) was in the grain (2.84%), and the upper stalk contained the least EE (0.29%). The parts also differed in their contents of crude cellulose (CS) and crude ash (CA) (P <0.001). Most organic matter (OM) was found in the corn cup (94.27%). The highest in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) was in the kernels (79.06%) and the lowest was in the lower stalk (38.13%). In terms of in vitro true organic matter digestibility (OMD) values of the corn plant and its 9 parts, the highest values were found in the kernels and the lowest in the lower stalk.Keywords: crude nutrients, in vitro true digestibility, parts of corn plant

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

Nutrient contents and in vitro digestibility of different parts of corn plant

Ayaşan

Çetinkaya

Aykanat³

et al. 2020

SA J. An. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of Hajar, et al (2019) showed that the crude protein of sorghum 12 FS9006, 13FB7001 and 12549001 variety were 6.62%, 6.47% and 9.18% respectively. In the study of Vaswani, et al (2016) the crude protein of Corn forage HTHM 5101, DHM 117 and HM variety were 8.39%, 6.56% and 7.09% respectively. In the study of Tufail et al, (2020) There were significant variations for green forage energy among the maize genotypes (Table 4).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Sufficient genetic diversity, heritability and genetic advancement under normal and heat stress environments are suitable for breeding improvement programs (Thapa et al, 2019). Vaswani et al (2016) showed two varieties of maize harvested at 70-80 DAP (days after planting) and resulted green, fresh, good quality and palatable forages were efficient for ruminant feed. According to Cahya (2018), harvest age determines the quality of Corn crops.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Genotype and Crop Age Effect on Nutritive Value of Corn Forage

Indriani

Yuwariah

Ruswandi

2021

IJARe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Corn crop (Zea mays) was one type of feed crop which is a good source of crude fiber for ruminant. Corn crops had several types of genotypes and each genotype had its advantages in terms of productivity and nutritional content. Methods: The study was conducted from January to May 2018, at the Agricultural Research and Development Research Studio located at Arjasari Village, Arjasari District, Bandung Regency, West Java, in Indonesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of various genotypes and crop ages on crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, energy and Nitrogen free extract of Corn forage. This research was designed with an experimental method using a Completely Randomized Design. The treatments in this study were the genotype of Corn crop and the crop age.Result: The results of the statistical analysis showed that the interaction of genotype and age gave different results on Nitrogen free extract and crude fiber at 5% significant level test. Genotype and age interaction did not give different results on Energy, Crude Fat and Crude Protein at 5% significant level test.

show abstract

“…Motri, Simon, Macha, KB5562, KB3961 hibrit mısır çeşitlerinde tanede protein oranının yönünden geçiş gruplarında yer aldığı belirlenmiştir (Tablo 2). Mısır tanesindeki protein oranını su stres uygulamasında % 6.59-8.16 [46], ikinci üründe ön bitkiye ve yıllara göre % 7.94-9.15 [23],Karadeniz koşullarında % 8.88-16.42 [35], Samsun koşullarında ana üründe % 10.14-10.69 [27], kaliteli proteinli mısırda %9.72 [47], farklı çinko uygulamasında % 6.1-7.9 [48], Ege bölgesi koşullarında % 6.18-7.84 [45], üç mısır çeşidinde %8.50-10.49 [49], Diyarbakır'da ana ve ikinci ürün koşullarında % 8.3-10.2 [9], İzmir koşullarında farklı çeşitlerde % 6.19 to 8.39 [50], farklı lokasyonlarda %6.9-7.8 [51], Konya, Bursa ve Sakarya bölgelerinde 36 genotipde % 6.41-9.43 [28], Şanlıurfa koşullarında ikinci üründe %7.67-14.50 [39] arasında değiştiği bildirilmiştir. Mısır bitkisinde protein oranı çeşide bağlı bir özellik olmakla birlikte, iklim koşulları ve yetişme dönemindeki çevresel koşullardan etkilenmektedir.…”

Section: Tanede Protein Oranı (%)unclassified