2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-015-1260-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient limitation of eco-physiological processes in tropical trees

Abstract: Key Message Tropical forests play a disproportionately large role in the global climate system, yet the extent to which nutrients limit the potential for tropical trees to increase carbon gain as atmospheric carbon dioxide rises is unknown. Abstract This review focuses on what is known about tropical tree responses to experimental nutrient addition and how such information is critical for developing a more complete picture of the ability of tropical forest to respond to a changing world. Most of our knowledge … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When the forest ecosystems showed a positive response to added nutrient, e.g. plant growth or rates of physiological processes were promoted, the added nutrient then could be interpreted as limiting to the ecosystem -and otherwise, as not limiting to the ecosystem (Santiago, 2015). We initially expected positive growth responses of trees exposed to N fertilization in this subtropical forest because N availability in the soil would be enhanced by N fertilization and the potential N limitation of plants in the forest ecosystem could be alleviated.…”
Section: Growth Responses Of Trees To N Fertilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the forest ecosystems showed a positive response to added nutrient, e.g. plant growth or rates of physiological processes were promoted, the added nutrient then could be interpreted as limiting to the ecosystem -and otherwise, as not limiting to the ecosystem (Santiago, 2015). We initially expected positive growth responses of trees exposed to N fertilization in this subtropical forest because N availability in the soil would be enhanced by N fertilization and the potential N limitation of plants in the forest ecosystem could be alleviated.…”
Section: Growth Responses Of Trees To N Fertilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high stand density in this mature subtropical forest, we suggest that N fertilization might potentially lead to increased self-and alien thinning of individuals through decreasing understory light availability. The pivotal role of light availability in the ecophysiological processes of understory growth forms has been widely recognized (Santiago, 2015). Due to the limited light availability, understory plants may not be able to incorporate the added nutrient and promote their photosynthetic rates (Alvarez-Clare et al, 2013).…”
Section: Growth Responses Of Small Trees Understorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El hecho de que los árboles pequeños hayan sido más sensibles a la fertilización se debe probablemente a que éstos se suelen encontrar bajo condiciones de luminosidad limitada en el sotobosque, además de que presentan un sistema radical más superficial y menos desarrollado, por lo que son más vulnerables a los incrementos extras de nutrientes en el sistema (Wright et al, 2011;Sayer & Banin, 2016). Asimismo, los árboles medianos y grandes tienden a inmovilizar más los nutrientes aplicados en la fertilización, por lo que es más difícil detectar sus efectos (Miller, 1981;Santiago, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…con N y NPK), otras negativamente (Eschweilera sclerophylla, Miconia sp., Inga sp., y Faramea multiflora), pero la mayoría no respondieron a la aplicación de nutrientes, lo cual también se evidenció en los experimentos de Mirmanto et al (1999) y Álvarez-Clare et al (2013. Para encontrar respuestas a tal variabilidad, es útil la revisión reciente de experimentos de fertilización en el trópico por Santiago (2015), quien concluyó que las mayores respuestas de los árboles a la aplicación de nutrientes se pueden agrupar en dos: por un lado, las respuestas a corto plazo, que incluyen aumento de concentración foliar de nutrientes, tasa fotosintética, conductancia estomática y eficiencia en el uso del agua. Por otro lado, las respuestas a largo plazo que incluyen incremento en el CDA, cambios en la biomasa de raíces y colonización por micorrizas, reducción en la capacidad de captura de nutrientes, entre otros (Santiago, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation