1988
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1988.33.4part2.0796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: A review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment1

Abstract: Phytoplanktoncan become limited by the availability of nutrients when light and temperature are adequate and loss rates are not excessive. The current paradigms for nutrient limitations in freshwater, estuarine, and marine environments are quite different. A review of the experimental and observational data used to infer P or N limitation of phytoplankton growth indicates that P limitation in freshwater environments can be demonstrated rigorously at several hierarchical levels of system complexity, from algal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
94
0
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 518 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
94
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…300) indicated P limitation (e.g. [32]). The nutrient effect on biomass, however, was only evident at lower temperatures (128C and 188C), while highest phytoplankton biomass was observed at 248C irrespective of nutrient conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…300) indicated P limitation (e.g. [32]). The nutrient effect on biomass, however, was only evident at lower temperatures (128C and 188C), while highest phytoplankton biomass was observed at 248C irrespective of nutrient conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estuaries show no evidence of I O~( T P (mg m")) stratifying with respect to salinity and temperature; thus, it is likely that the phytoplankton Generally, herbivory and turbidity account data) for the deficit between observed phytoplankton biomass and that expected from lake modorders of magnitude was unexpected a s phytoplankton els, with an average deficit of 32 % remaining. This is element requirements are fairly similar in lakes and as accurate as we can expect because PP itself has a estuaries (Hecky & Kilham 1988). The result cannot b e coefficient of variation of approximately 30% and w e attributed to estuarine flushing as this would result in a cannot estimate B with greater accuracy than PP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In their comparative review of nutrient limitation in aquatic systems, Hecky & Kilham (1988) argued that, although N may well be the key limiting nutrient in coastal waters, the evidence is inconclusive as it 1s mostly derived from bioassays and observations of inorganic nutrient concentrations. Since this review, a series of mesocosm experiments on N versus P limitation have been conducted (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Menurut [21], fitoplankton dapat tumbuh dengan baik pada konsentrasi nitrat 0,5 -2 mg/L dan fosfat 0,01 -0,1 mg/L. Lebih jauh [11] menyatakan bahwa perairanperairan yang terdapat upwelling adalah merupakan perairan yang kaya akan nutrien dan tingkat kesuburannya tinggi.…”
Section: Parameter Oseanografiunclassified