1973
DOI: 10.1029/wr009i005p01450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient losses after clear‐cut logging and slash burning in the Oregon Coast Range

Abstract: Nutrient release from three small watersheds in Oregon's Coast Range was monitored for 2 years before and 2 years after logging. One watershed, Flynn Creek (203.14 ha), served as an untreated control. Deer Creek (303.32 ha) was patch‐cut. No change in the concentration or yield of nitrate nitrogen, phosphorus, or potassium was observed after logging. Needle Branch (70.68 ha) was clear‐cut and burned. Maximum nitrate nitrogen concentrations increased from 0.70 to 2.10 mg/1. Nitrate nitrogen concentrations retur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrogen fixation inputs can sometimes far exceed atmospheric inputs Cole 1984, Bormann et al 1993b) and contribute to leaching of and cations in gravelly Ϫ NO 3 soils (Binkley et al 1982, Van Miegroet andCole 1984). Coastal alder stands with fine soils lose little , even after burning (Brown et al 1973), and can Ϫ NO 3 accumulate Ͼ20 Mg N/ha (Franklin et al 1968). In summary, these anomalous cases demonstrate that the effects of chronic N inputs on ecosystem N retention or loss is sometimes unpredictable because of our limited understanding of ecosystem processing of chronic N inputs.…”
Section: Anomalous Cases Of Ecosystem Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen fixation inputs can sometimes far exceed atmospheric inputs Cole 1984, Bormann et al 1993b) and contribute to leaching of and cations in gravelly Ϫ NO 3 soils (Binkley et al 1982, Van Miegroet andCole 1984). Coastal alder stands with fine soils lose little , even after burning (Brown et al 1973), and can Ϫ NO 3 accumulate Ͼ20 Mg N/ha (Franklin et al 1968). In summary, these anomalous cases demonstrate that the effects of chronic N inputs on ecosystem N retention or loss is sometimes unpredictable because of our limited understanding of ecosystem processing of chronic N inputs.…”
Section: Anomalous Cases Of Ecosystem Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Situations with noticeable losses [2,4,6,7,12,13,20,27,28,44,54] or more limited losses of nutrients [16,43,57,58] have been reported. The case of the large losses observed the after clear-cutting of the Hubbard Brook experimental forest represents a very specific situation whose results cannot be directly generalized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase generally reached a maximum two to seven years after the harvest, and was followed by a decrease [11,47,57,85,93]. In contrast, McColl [51] measured a decrease in nitrogen leaching after a clear-cut, when litter and residues were discarded, whereas an immobilisation of the nutrients in the residues following the harvest was also described [12,17,26].…”
Section: Leaching Root Decomposition and Microbial Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%