2015
DOI: 10.5958/0976-4038.2015.00025.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient Management in High Density Cashew Plantation under Coastal Zones of Odisha

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the three varieties, Bhaskara recorded maximum mean plant height (4.70 m), it was followed by 3.31 m in NRCC Sel-2 (3.31 m) and 3.07 m in H-130 (Table 1). Similar results have been reported for plant height in the previous studies in cashew (Tripathy et al 2015).The genotypic effect of variety on plant height was more pronounced in the plants under ultra density due to the heavy pruning suggesting that the pruning response of a cultivar is genetically determined. The genotypes which are less responsive to pruning produce excessive vegetative growth and poor reproductive traits and thus, yield poor.…”
Section: Plant Heightsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the three varieties, Bhaskara recorded maximum mean plant height (4.70 m), it was followed by 3.31 m in NRCC Sel-2 (3.31 m) and 3.07 m in H-130 (Table 1). Similar results have been reported for plant height in the previous studies in cashew (Tripathy et al 2015).The genotypic effect of variety on plant height was more pronounced in the plants under ultra density due to the heavy pruning suggesting that the pruning response of a cultivar is genetically determined. The genotypes which are less responsive to pruning produce excessive vegetative growth and poor reproductive traits and thus, yield poor.…”
Section: Plant Heightsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With respect to spacing, the plants spaced at 5×5 m were recorded highest fruit weight (94.85 g), fruit length (6.16 cm) and fruit width (4.87 cm) and least values were observed in 2.5 × 2.5 m for apple weight (78.80 g) and apple length (5.61 cm). Similar observations were recorded in cashew (Tripathy et al 2015) and other fruit crops like mango (Sousa et al 2012, Gaikwad et al 2017. V1-H-130, V2-NRCC Sel.…”
Section: Cashew Apple Characterssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where: D1= Canopy spread in E-W direction (m), D2 = Canopy diameter in N-S direction (m), 3 = Number of replications. The Percentage ground coverage according to Tripathy, et al [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground coverage and its percentage of cashew canopy were worked out using the procedure used by [9].…”
Section: The Ground Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%