2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient removal by NF and RO membranes in a decentralized sanitation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods have been used to remove phosphate from wastewater, such as chemical precipitation [5], biological processes [6], adsorption [7], ion exchange [8], membrane technologies [9] and constructed wetlands [10]. Among these available approaches, adsorption method is believed to be one of the most economical, effective, and reliable methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been used to remove phosphate from wastewater, such as chemical precipitation [5], biological processes [6], adsorption [7], ion exchange [8], membrane technologies [9] and constructed wetlands [10]. Among these available approaches, adsorption method is believed to be one of the most economical, effective, and reliable methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De-Bashan and Bashan 2004), reverse osmosis (Van Voorthuizen et al 2005) and sorption processes (Morse et al 1998;Kang et al 2003). Among these techniques, adsorption is a promising method to treat waste water, especially at lower phosphate concentrations, which pose a challenge to the use of the traditional flocculation methods (Seida and Nakano 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques such as chemical precipitation [4], adsorption [5], reverse osmosis [6], biological removal [7,8], and constructed wetlands [9] have been employed for removal of phosphate from wastewaters. Among these available approaches, chemical precipitation and biological removal are generally not able to meet the stringent effluent standards and reverse osmosis is a high capital cost, while the adsorption methods proved to be more promising due to their low cost, effective treatment in dilute solutions, and high uptake capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%