2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04153-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient removal from digested swine wastewater by combining ammonia stripping with struvite precipitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentration of total phosphorous was reduced to 114 mg L −1 from initial value of 380 mg L −1 (67% reduction) while magnesium content was reduced to 37 mg L −1 from initial value of 75 mg L −1 (26% reduction) ( Table 4 ). Although it does not reach the reduction level as reported by previous researchers ( Abel-Denee et al., 2018 ; Cao et al., 2019 ; Xu et al., 2016 ; Wilsenach et al., 2007 ), this result implied that the reactive crystallization works well with POME in reducing the elements that will subsequently form struvite naturally in the wastewater, thus reducing the magnitude of the problem of struvite formation in POME treatment pipelines. The experiment was done assuming the temperature and pH were constant at 30 °C and at pH of 10.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Concentration of total phosphorous was reduced to 114 mg L −1 from initial value of 380 mg L −1 (67% reduction) while magnesium content was reduced to 37 mg L −1 from initial value of 75 mg L −1 (26% reduction) ( Table 4 ). Although it does not reach the reduction level as reported by previous researchers ( Abel-Denee et al., 2018 ; Cao et al., 2019 ; Xu et al., 2016 ; Wilsenach et al., 2007 ), this result implied that the reactive crystallization works well with POME in reducing the elements that will subsequently form struvite naturally in the wastewater, thus reducing the magnitude of the problem of struvite formation in POME treatment pipelines. The experiment was done assuming the temperature and pH were constant at 30 °C and at pH of 10.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Previously, it was indicated that nitrogen removal may be accelerated as the temperature increases [ 35 , 36 ]. Other researchers [ 37 , 38 ] also reported similar results at high pH (pH range 10.5–11) and high temperature (40–80 °C) [ 39 ]. Although ammonia gas stripping by controlling pH and temperature is the most widely used AOP for nitrogen removal from wastewater, when reactive chemical species from NTP are abundant, another possible mechanism for TN removal may be partial selective catalytic oxidation/reduction reactions (SCR/SCO) or wet oxidation [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Most of the nitrogen removal processes that have been developed for municipal and industrial wastewaters have been applied to animal wastes too, such as biological nitrogen removal [16], ammonia stripping [17], ion exchange [18], and struvite crystallization [19]. Among the nitrogen removal processes above, ammonia stripping is widely used due to its simplicity and lower costs [20]. Ammonia stripping is a simple desorption process used to remove the ammonia from the waste material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional ammonia stripping, an alkali is added to the manure or wastewater to raise the pH [20], it converts ammonium ions to ammonia gas according to Equation (1):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%