2004
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrient Retention Efficiency in Streams Receiving Inputs from Wastewater Treatment Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
109
2
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
109
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Net nutrient uptake was calculated by measuring ambient longitudinal declines in nutrient concentrations (e.g., Marti et al 2004) for DIN and PO 4 -P. Uptake length (S w ) was calculated as the inverse slope of the regression line of logtransformed nutrient concentrations against distance. In order to standardize uptake to reach characteristics, we converted uptake length to uptake velocity (V f ) using the equation V f = uz/S w , where u is velocity and z is depth (Webster and Valett 2006).…”
Section: Net Nutrient Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Net nutrient uptake was calculated by measuring ambient longitudinal declines in nutrient concentrations (e.g., Marti et al 2004) for DIN and PO 4 -P. Uptake length (S w ) was calculated as the inverse slope of the regression line of logtransformed nutrient concentrations against distance. In order to standardize uptake to reach characteristics, we converted uptake length to uptake velocity (V f ) using the equation V f = uz/S w , where u is velocity and z is depth (Webster and Valett 2006).…”
Section: Net Nutrient Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reach length is much longer than that used in typical nutrient uptake studies, the river is also much larger than previous studies (e.g., Hall et al, 2002). Streams receiving WWTP effluent typically have long net uptake lengths (Haggard et al, 2001, Haggard et al, 2005Marti et al, 2004). Therefore, we considered it necessary to use long reaches.…”
Section: Sand Pumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient uptake length is a measure of the stream's capacity to retain and transform nutrients and is defined as the average distance a nutrient atom travels before it is immobilized by either biotic or abiotic processes (Newbold et al, 1981;Stream Solute Workshop, 1990). Previous studies have used nutrient uptake lengths to assess nutrient retention in relatively undisturbed systems (e.g., Marti and Sabater, 1996;Webster et al, 2003) and in streams receiving WWTP effluent (Haggard et al, 2001, Marti et al, 2004, Haggard et al, 2005 and to measure the response of streams other management practices such as forestry (e.g., Webster et al, 1991, Sabater et al, 2000. We determined uptake lengths by using the natural decline in nutrient concentration with distance downstream using the following equation:…”
Section: Nutrient Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Past research shows that some activities reduce retention efficiency (i.e. retention relative to nutrient flux), such as channel modification (Sweeney et al, 2004;Bukaveckas, 2007), nutrient loading (Martí et al, 2004;Bernot et al, 2006;Newbold et al, 2006) and other forms of water pollution that inhibit biological communities responsible for nutrient uptake Lottig et al, 2007). Conversely, retention efficiency may increase with other human activities, such as riparian vegetation removal, through increases in light for primary producers (Sabater et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%