2017
DOI: 10.5539/jas.v9n3p233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nutrients Use Efficiency and Uptake Characteristics of Panicum virgatum for Fodder Production

Abstract: Panicum virgatum could produce cattle feed with lower costs due to the low input requirements and its perennial nature. Dry biomass yield vs. N-P-K nutrient uptake relations as well as the N-mineralization and the N-fertilization recovery fraction for Panicum virgatum (cv. Alamo) were determined under field conditions for four N-fertilization (0, 80, 160 and 240 kg ha -1 ) and two irrigation levels (0 and 250 mm), οn two soils in central Greece with rather different moisture status. It was found that the dry f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Switchgrass–legumes mixed cropping produced hay with protein content increased almost threefold than switchgrass monoculture, which is in line with the literature reporting that vetch–cereal mixed cropping is highly productive in protein-rich aerial biomass [ 37 ]. The current study’s findings demonstrate that a zero-fertilization switchgrass monoculture system generates animal feed with a protein content of about 5%, which is in perfect agreement with a previous survey conducted in the same location, despite the crop being in its second and third growing year [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Switchgrass–legumes mixed cropping produced hay with protein content increased almost threefold than switchgrass monoculture, which is in line with the literature reporting that vetch–cereal mixed cropping is highly productive in protein-rich aerial biomass [ 37 ]. The current study’s findings demonstrate that a zero-fertilization switchgrass monoculture system generates animal feed with a protein content of about 5%, which is in perfect agreement with a previous survey conducted in the same location, despite the crop being in its second and third growing year [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The levels of fertilization dressings were decided based on NPK concentration of switchgrass tissue found in previous studies in the same area (e.g., 0.8% N, 0.08% P, and 1.3% K, and potassium, respectively) [ 38 ]. Considering a deep rooting system obtained after 9 and 10 years of growth, the applied levels PK are expected to be rather supporting to the intercropped legume crop.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mix (Fig 3d). Unlike Mn, Fe levels were very poor in sorghum stovers as compared to another source of feed ingredients used in the study area.As reported earlier(Garg et al 2005;Udar et al 2003;Agegnehu and Amede, 2017;Giannoulis et al 2017 andMutwedu et al 2020), these forages have Zn and Mn levels below the critical level in many of the semi-arid zones of India.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…This highlights the importance of several factors in determining the availability of micro-minerals from soil to plants and then to animals. Forage micro-mineral concentration varies depending on soil type (Garg et al 2005) and growing conditions (Agegnehu and Amide, 2017;Giannoulis et al 2017 andMutwedu et al 2020). Only a small percentage of trace elements are present in the soil utilised by plants, according to the physio-chemical constitution of the soil (Herdt and Hoff, 2011).…”
Section: Soil-plant-animal Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the protein yield harvested with the first cut was much higher compared to the second cut, in all fertiliser treatments. In the experiment conducted by Giannoulis et al [67], the switchgrass protein content was at the level of 62.5 g kg −1 with low nitrogen fertilisation. According to the authors, this confirms the possibility of growing switchgrass on less fertile soils and producing feed at low inputs.…”
Section: Nutritional Valuementioning
confidence: 99%